Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Remember that a prosperous economy does not imply the most happy country or economy.
Therefore high rates of crime, substance abuse, insecure employment, and family dissolution may exist, but <em>the scale in which this occurs</em> may be relatively lower when compared to a poor economy.
For example, the scale of such vices in United States is lower than in Mexico a poorer economy.
Answer:
$18.84
Explanation:
Firstly, we need to find the volume of the solid shape. We have identified the solid shape to be a cone.
The volume of a cone is v = 1/3 π r^2 h
Here π = 3.14, r = d/2 = 2/2 = 1 inch and h = 9 inches
V = 1/3 * 3.14 * 1 * 1 * 9 = 9.42 cube.inches
Total value of liquid in the container is thus 9.42 * $2 = $18.84
Answer: The following is not considered when you are calculating cost of quality:<u><em> The cost of gaining formal acceptance of project deliverable.</em></u>
Cost of Quality contains all the costs that are both internal and external to the system; whereas, the Cost of Quality include the conformance, considering any costs connected with both appraisal and interference.
Cost of Quality is calculated as :
Cost of Quality = Cost of Poor Quality + Cost of Good Quality
Answer:
Note: The missing part of the question is <em>"using variable costing and absorption costing. Explain the difference"</em>
<em />
Solution
According to variable costing, the unit cost based was
= $8.20 + $11.20 + $9.20
= $28.6
According to absorption costing,
Total Manufacturing costs= Direct material + Direct labor + Overhead
= $8.20 + $11.20 + ($386,400/42,000 units) + $9.20
= $8.20 + $11.20 + $9.2 + $9.2
= $37.8
The difference between the variable costing and the absorption cost is because the product costing using variable costing method only includes variable costs.
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Follows are the two ways of describing its high return:
Firstly, the mutual fund is invested in pretty unstable debt and is reciprocating with greater yields for taking a risk.
Secondly, during every decrease in bond yields, the finance kept bonds so the income on stocks exceeded this same rate of interest significantly. Remember that bond costs skyrocket as interest rates drop as well as give the purchaser an investment income. Because once interest rates are now close to zero, it's also likely that they could increase as well as the owners would then lose their money. Its high return could be due to a drop in interest rates, and not only will it not be replicated, but the low or even low return will almost definitely be followed by either a rise in interest rates.
