1. This case primarily involves an implied contract, where things may not have been written down but the actions by both sides show there was an agreement.
2. Implied contract may also be refereed to as an implied-in-fact contract because the facts (not written documents) show there was an agreement.
3. The court would rely on the conduct of the parties. Since there isn't a written agreement, they look at the actions people took to see if they behaved as if they were in a contract.
4. Implied contracts do not require an agreement between the parties. Someone may be operating on the assumption of an implied contract and the other person disagrees that they acted in a way that implied a contract, but it is their actions that matter not how they felt about the agreement.
5. To determine if a contract exists the court will look at: furnished a good or service, expected to be paid, knew or should have known about that expectation, had a chance to reject the goods or services
Answer:
C. MACRS depreciation expense.
Explanation:
Material participation in an income-producing activity. That is, an activity that is regular, continuous, and substantial leading to income-producing actions, in which the taxpayer materially participates is an active income or loss.
What’s on the information technology unit test?
Answer:
B) an agency relationship.
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, executory contract, etc.
In this scenario, Consolidated (principal) empowers Doha Ltd., an Egyptian firm to enter into contracts in certain countries on behalf of Consolidated. Thus, this is an agency relationship.
An agency relationship can be defined as a mutual relationship existing between two parties, wherein a principal authorizes the agent to act as the principal's representative or on his behalf (fiduciary role) in dealing with third parties.
Basically, Consolidated is the principal based on the agency relationship while Doha Ltd. is considered to be an agent and as such is authorized or empowered to enter into contracts in certain countries on behalf of Consolidated.
Answer:
Efficiency variance $4,000 unfavorable
Explanation:
<em>Labour efficiency variance is the difference between the actual time taken to achieve a given production output less the standard hours allowed for same multiplied by the standard labour rate
. </em>
Hours
1000 units should have taken (1000× 2 hours) 2,000
but did take <u>2,500</u>
efficiency variance in (hours) 500 unfavorable
Standard rate <u> × $8</u>
Efficiency variance <u>4,000</u> unfavorable
