Answer:
The claim that is arguable is <em>B: Senators should not have term limits.</em>
Explanation:
I chose B because it is the only claim that contains a personal opinion. All the others are facts: <em>there are more Democrats that Republicans in Congress, the Constitution divides powers between the federal government and state governments, and the United States has 50 states</em>. All of these are facts, but the second one (<em>B</em>) is a personal opinion, and we realize that when reading the word <em>should</em>, therefore is arguable because another person might have a different opinion about the same subject.
Answer: Eagle
Explanation:
Isaiah 40;31
KJV:But they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint.
Unless a statute or rule specifically states otherwise, hearsay is not admissible as evidence in court. Therefore, even if a statement is truly hearsay, it might still be relevant to the case if an exception applies.
Hearsay can be defined as a statement made regarding the veracity of the claim and something outside of the court .
Hearsay testimony is typically not allowed in courtrooms. Hearsay cannot usually be used as the basis for a court decision.
Even when the trial is happening its (hearsay) not allowed
To learn more about hearsay click here :
brainly.com/question/18407390
#SPJ4
