1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
3 years ago
15

Baxton courier services recently equipped all of its employees with electronic tablets in order to track the whereabouts of the

shipments precisely. the cost that baxton courier services incurred is an example of _____ cost.
Business
1 answer:
DaniilM [7]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Baxton courier services recently equipped all of its employees with electronic tablets in order to track the whereabouts of the shipments precisely. the cost that baxton courier services incurred is an example of <span><u>OPERATING COST.</u>

</span>Operating costs are very often and naturally incurred costs involved in putting up businesses or companies. This type of cost helps the company stay afloat and essentially help it maintain its existence. Operational costs may include the operation of devices, equipment, and facilities of the company. </span>
You might be interested in
Young Bobby opened a lemonade stand in his front yard. He used $4 worth of lemons, sugar, and cups, and paid his little sister $
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

$2

Explanation:

Surplus value = revenue - cost

Revenue = $1 × 7 = $7

Cost = $4 + $1 = $5

Surplus value = $2

I hope my answer helps you

8 0
3 years ago
2. Roth retirement funds require you to pay taxes on your investment dollars up-front, while
leonid [27]

Answer:

The Pros and Cons of Roth IRA and the Traditional IRA or 401(K):

Roth IRA is not advantageous to those, who are starting to save late in their career.  It favors the younger worker, who is starting out with low-paying jobs at lower-paying tax rates, who will later be earning more.

With Roth IRA, you suffer the tax burden upfront when you are active and while making your contributions, so that you can enjoy your retirement benefits tax-free.  This is why the younger worker benefits more.  In the prime of life with little responsibilities, you can settle the taxman so that you can be free of him later in older age.  But, if you are in the high tax bracket, this category is not funny for you, anyway.  The IRS has an income limit for this category, therefore, you must go for the traditional IRA.

The traditional IRA saves you the tax burden initially, but you can never be free of the IRS.  It must take its share later, having allowed you to enjoy tax-free contributions.  When the net is filled, the IRS cuts its percentage off.

You will never feel bad then, because your tax rate will surely be reduced in comparison with when you are making the contributions.  So, it is just and right to allow the IRS, who generously helped you to grow the nest in the first place to take its just and lawful cut.  It does not bleed too much then, afterall you are drying up with life's responsibilities, including reduced tax bracket, and many of your children have started answering to the IRS independently.  This is the better time to deal with IRS, anyway.

Explanation:

The question has the explanation:  ROTH IRAs are retirement funds that allow you to pay taxes on your investments into retirement funds as you are making the contributions, so that you are free to make your withdrawals after at least 5 years without paying additional taxes.

The traditional IRAs or the 401(K) encourage you to make your retirement contributions without paying taxes on them so that you can contribute more.  Then the IRS will bounce on you to pay the taxes when you are making withdrawals having grown the investments.

IRAs mean Individual Retirement Accounts which individuals use to save and accumulate their retirement funds.

5 0
3 years ago
What is licensure? I’m doing intro to business
bekas [8.4K]
The granting or regulation of licenses, as for professionals.
8 0
3 years ago
5. The International Property Right Index scores countries based on the legal and political environment and how well property ri
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

I used the most recent figures of the international property rights index (year 2019), and the most recent GDP per capita estimamtes by the IMF in purchasing power parity. (year 2019)

Three countries with high scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):

  1. Finland - score of 8.712 - U$ 46.430
  2. Switzerland - score of 8.571 - U$ 64.649
  3. United States - score of 8.202 - U$ 62.606

Three countries with low scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):

  1. Ukraine - score of 4.432 - U$ 9.283
  2. Pakistan - score of 3.874 - U$ 5.680
  3. Haiti - score of 2.703 - U$ 1.864

The pattern that we find is that there is a strong correlation between the International Property Right Index scores and the GDP per capita figures. This is consistent with the findings in other similar rankings such as the Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum, and the Economic Freedom Index, published by the Heritage Foundation.

What can be interpreted is that property rights, and the strong enforcement of those property rights promote economic development and growth. This is because the protection of private property stimulates human action. For example, the United States has a strong judiciary, and rule of law. In this country, people can invest their money in a project with the certainty that those invesments will not be expropriated by an arbitrary judiciary. This promotes development because investing leads to higher economic output.

Those same incentives do not exist in countries that do not enforce property rights, and that is one of the main reasons why they are poor.  

4 0
3 years ago
According to the Federal Housing Finance Board, the mean price of a single-family home two years ago was $299,500. A real estate
Tems11 [23]

Answer: A.There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has increased from its level two years ago of $299,500

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that according to the Federal Housing Finance Board, the mean price of a single-family home two years ago was $299,500 and that a real estate broker believes that due to recent credit crunch, the mean price has increased since then and the result is that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

The conclusion based on the results of the test is that since the null hypothesis has been rejected, it simply means that there are sufficient evidence that there has been an increase in the mean price since two years ago.

Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In february, paula, the manager of a landscaping company, is looking at the upcoming need for more workers to handle the increas
    6·1 answer
  • Susan has a 401k plan through her job and has accumulated $375,000 in her account. Her company has invested her funts in a high
    9·1 answer
  • Michael noticed that all the fish in his aquarium direct their mouths toward the top of the tank when he walks by. this is most
    10·1 answer
  • OFUNILS
    14·1 answer
  • What did economic liberalism stand for​
    7·1 answer
  • You are a collector of antique coins. you purchase a silver dollar minted in 1898. is this sale included in gdp for the current
    5·1 answer
  • Why are websites operated by recognized print publishers, such as newspapers and journals, generally accurate and reliable?
    6·1 answer
  • Wat is de boekwaarde
    5·2 answers
  • Differentiate between manmade and natural attraction​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the difference between profit and revenue?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!