a + b = 88 <span>
<span>
</span><span>ab = y
</span><span>
</span><span>a = 88 - b
</span><span>
</span><span>y = (88 - b)*b
</span>
<span>y = -b^2 + 88b
</span><span>
</span><span>Take the derivative and set equal to 0
</span><span>
</span><span>y' = -2b + 88 = 0
</span><span>
</span><span>2b = 88
</span>
<span>b = 44 </span></span>
<span><span>a=44</span></span>
<span><span> both numbers are 44</span></span>
Yes
No
Yes
No
The slope is 8.5
Take any 2 points and apply the slope equation. You will get the same slope.
The constant proportionality is the same as the slope.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
2-3/8 = 2.375
2-2/5 = 2.4
2.4 - 2.375 = 0.025
Your friend's skateboard ramp is 0.025 foot higher
than your skateboard ramp is.
That's about 1.1% higher . . . 0.3 inch, or about 7.62 milometers.
Answer:
We <em>fail to reject H₀ </em>as there is insufficient evidence at 0.5% level of significance to conclude that the mean hours of TV watched per day differs from the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a two-tailed test.
We first need to calculate the test statistic. The test statistic is calculated as follows:
Z_calc = X - μ₀ / (s /√n)
where
- X is the mean number of hours
- μ₀ is the mean that the sociologist claims is true
- s is the standard deviation
- n is the sample size
Therefore,
Z_calc = (3.02 - 3) / (2.64 /√(1326))
= 0.2759
Now we have to calculate the z-value. The z-value is calculated as follows:
z_α/2 = z_(0.05/2) = z_0.025
Using the p-value method:
P = 1 - α/2
= 1 - 0.025
= 0.975
Thus, using the positive z-table, you will find that the z-value is
1.96.
Therefore, we reject H₀ if | Z_calc | > z_(α/2)
Thus, since
| Z_calc | < 1.96, we <em>fail to reject H₀ </em>as there is insufficient evidence at 0.5% level of significance to conclude that the mean hours of TV watched per day differs from the claim.
Answer:
2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The absolute value of a negative number will switch to a positive when the indicators are removed.
