Answer:
<h3>An economist would view a monopoly as not beneficial and optimal to society. A businessperson would view monopolies as a great idea to maximize profits due to the lack of competition</h3>
Explanation:
hope it's helps you if i am sorry if my answer is wrong
Answer:
These two are cash equivalents:
Money market funds
Three-month Treasury bills
Because they represent short-term investments that a company makes with the goal of getting rid of any excess cash that would otherwise be left unused while it is losing value because of inflation.
In other words, the main goal of investments in money market funds and three-month treasury bills, is to prevent cash from losing value due to inflation, and because of that, those investments are considered cash equivalents.
Answer:
$0, income statement s not affected.
Explanation:
The purchase and resale of treasury stock does not affect the income statement. When a company's treasury stock is resold, additional paid-in capital increases (if the stock were sold at a price above cost) or decreases (if the stock were sold at a price below cost).
Answer:
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Explanation:
Is necessary to consider different amount of suppliers and evaluate the cost. We will choose the number of suppliers which offers a lower cost.
- EMV1 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk + cost of managing supplier = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05+16000 = 9600 + 24000 + 16000 = $ 49600
- EMV2 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk of each supplier*unique event risk of each supplier + cost of managing 2 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 1200 + 16000*2 = $ 42800
- EMV3 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of managing 3 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 16000*3 = $ 57600
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
