Answer:
This is not correct, as the information systems in this age are rapidly transforming, due to artificial intelligence and IoT.
Answer:
$112,807
Explanation:
To calculate the amount of money you borrowed, you have to use the formula to calculate the present value:
PV=FV/(1+r)^n
PV= pressent value
FV= future value= 647,514
r= rate= 6%
n= number of periods of time= 30
PV=647,514/(1+0.06)^30
PV=647,514/(1.06)^30
PV=647,514/5.74
PV=112,807
According to this, you originally borrowed $112,807 for this house.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
Answer:
All Individuals, whether rich or poor,are dissatisfied with their material well-being and would like more.
Explanation:
Individuals wanting more and not being satisfied with their material well being goes back to the fundamental problem of economics-unlimited human wants. Economists argue that human wants are unlimited and insatiable irrespective of their economic class. Whether rich or poor, no man is satisfied with his material well-being. Every man still feel something is lacking after acquiring so much or so little. He still has the scarcity problem.
This never-ending desire is embedded in the physiological make up of a man. When a man gets food, then he wants house. When he gets house, he wants car. When he gets a car, he wants to buy a private jet. In short, the more he gets, the more he wants more.
And that`s is the reason why you would win $1 million and stills not satisfied with having enough. You would still believe you lack something. You would still want to acquire more just to solve this scarcity problem.
Other options do not explain the problem ; they just points at microeconomics and macroeconomics issues.
Answer:
Turbo Tech has been able to offer more perceived value than Best Mobile
Explanation:
Turbo Tech has managed to market itself as a superior brand compared to Best Mobile. Through aggressive marketing, Turbo has convinced the industry that it is better than Best mobile.
Marketing is about creating brand perception. If customers agree with your arguments, the brand gains an advantage in the market. Perception is not reality. These two competitors have the same unit cost and market price. It could mean that their quality is also on the same level.
Turbo Tech has a better martketing strategy than Best Mobile.