1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bingel [31]
3 years ago
13

A country recently experienced a drop in consumer purchases and a rise in business inventories of durable goods. Wages grew slow

ly and unemployment increased. Business investment in plant and equipment dropped sharply and profits fell. Both interest rates and stock prices fell. Which of the following statements best represents the country’s current economy?
Business
1 answer:
brilliants [131]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A recession

Explanation:

A recession is a period of slow or negative economic growth that lasts several months. In a recession, there is a general decline in productivity in the economy. In other words, the GDP growth rate drops too low or turns negatives.

Due to low productivity, unemployment rate rises as the industries and services sectors lay-off workers instead of creating job opportunities.  There is reduced consumer confidence leading to low retail sales and a decline in prices.

Negative growth implies reduced levels of investment in the economy. Businesses experience low profits, and hence, stock prices fall.  Economist considers recessions a part of a normal business cycle.

You might be interested in
Saul and Pepper have been friends since kindergarten. Both Saul and Pepper have good part-time jobs. Pepper deposits a portion o
ella [17]

Answer:

1.  Both IOUs pay out the same amount of money ($107)

2. Saul’s loan from Pepper is less risky

3. Yes, Pepper should lend Saul the money. Yes, John should lend Jackson the money

Explanation:

1. Let calculate the amount of money to be paid on each IOU:

At the end of one month, Saul's IOU = $ (100 + 100 * 0.07) = $<u>107</u>

<u>Saul pays back $107 to Pepper at the end of one month</u>

At the end of three months, Jackson's IOU = $ (100 + 100 * 0.07) = $<u>107</u>

<u>Jackson pays back $107 to John at the end of three months</u>

<u />

Hence, both Saul and Jackson pay the same amount on their IOUs

Whilst both IOU of Saul and Jackson pay out the same amount, they do so under different time durations. Saul’s IOU to Pepper pays out the amount of money in a shorter duration of time (one month) as compared to that of Jackson which takes three months.

2. Saul's loan from Pepper is less risky. This is because Saul and Pepper have been friends for a verl long time (since kindergarten); that's ample time to have known one another. There is little to no surprise to be displayed between them as they pretty much know all there is to know about one another. This stands in contrast with Jackson with whom John recently became friends; although he has a reputation of being reliable but there is still a greater decree of uncertainty about him since its a new friendship. For example, Jackson could default on his IOU agreement.

On the other hand, while Saul's loan from Pepper is to be payed back in one month, Jackson's loan from John is to be returned over a time span of three months. This gives Jackson more time to spread out repayment much more conveniently than Saul but then again, that's what Saul spends most of his income on.

Saul is taking the loan to advance his investment in his baseball collection which could yield more income for Saul

<u>Hence, overall, Saul's IOU seems less risky</u>

3. Yes, Pepper should lend Saul the money. Asides the fact that they have been friends for over a decade (at the least), Saul already spends his income on building his baseball card collection anyway. It's a win-win for both party; Saul gets the satisfaction of adding an extra valuable card to his collection while Pepper gets the satisfaction of getting an extra $7 from her loan to Saul which she can add to her savings.

Yes, John should John lend the money to Jackson. Jackson already has a strong work and office etiquette which is evident by his reliability. Furthermore, if all goes as agreed, John and Jackson's new friendship could be further deepened and strengthened.

8 0
4 years ago
Nabor industries is considering going public but is unsure of a fair offering price for the company. The firm's CFO has gathered
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

e. $3,892,587.08

Explanation:

The value of Nabor Industries entire company using the free cash flows can be determined by calculating the present value of all free cash flows that will be occurred in the future in the following manner:

Present value of 2004 free cash flow                            $176,991.15

200,000(1+13%)^-1

Present value of 2005 free cash flow                            $234,944

300,000(1+13%)^-2

Present value of 2006 free cash flow                            $277,220.06

400,000(1+13%)^-3

Present value of cash flows after 2006                         $3,203,431.86

((400,000(1+4%))/(13%-4%))*(1+13%)^-3

Value of Nabor Corporation                                            $3,892,587.07

So based on the above calculations, our answer is e. $3,892,587.08

8 0
3 years ago
Should protesting be allowed at Biden’s inauguration?
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

Explanation:

No, He deserves a peaceful inauguration.

3 0
3 years ago
The per-unit cost of an item is its average total cost (= total cost/quantity). suppose that a new cell phone application costs
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Cost per unit= $2,500.70

Explanation:

Cost per unit of an item is the fixed cost of producing the item plus the variable cost.

That is:

Total cost = fixed cost + variable cost

In this instance the fixed cost (cost of the application) is given as $250,000

The variable cost (cost of delivery) is $0.7

For 100 units variable cost will be $0.7* 100= $70

Total cost= 250,000+ 70

Total cost= 250,070

Cost per unit = Total cost/ Number of units

Cost per unit= 250,070/100

Cost per unit= $2,500.70

8 0
3 years ago
On April 30, 2017, Tilton Products purchased machinery for $88,000. The useful life of this machinery is estimated at 8 years, w
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

$6,666.67 and $10,000

Explanation:

The computation of the depreciation expense for the year 2017 and 2018 is shown below:

= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)  

= ($88,000 - $8,000) ÷ (8 years)  

= ($80,000) ÷ (8 years)  

= $10,000

Since the machinery is purchased on April 30 and we assume the books are closed on December 31 so the number of months calculated is 8 months

Therefore for the year 2017 the depreciation expense is

= $10,000 × 8 months ÷ 12 months

= $6,666.67

And, for the year 2018 the depreciation expense is same i.e $10,000

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The span of control for a manager:
    10·1 answer
  • You are an automotive engineer working on an application that will automatically parallel park a car. the intelligent technique
    11·1 answer
  • Which option can be a communication barrier to workplace diversity
    9·1 answer
  • Nick has set up his steel factory near a community lake. The waste from his factory is directly thrown in the lake and is causin
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the cost of quality classification for costs such as inspection, testing, and other tasks to ensure th
    9·1 answer
  • Open market operations:___________.
    7·1 answer
  • A bond par value is $1,000 and the coupon rate is 6.3 percent. The bond price was $946.86 at the beginning of the year and $984.
    7·1 answer
  • How does increased competition through FDI in the form of greenfield investments affect the host country
    10·1 answer
  • Ly Company disposed of two different assets.
    13·1 answer
  • Volatility or Blank______ increases for equity holders when leverage increases. Multiple choice question. inevitability certaint
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!