Answer:The law of supply and demand is a theory that explains the interaction between the sellers of a resource and the buyers for that resource. The theory defines what effect the relationship between the availability of a particular product and the desire (or demand) for that product has on its price.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option D Data Dump
Explanation:
The provision of the unneccesary data alongwith the other necessary data to the user is reffered to as Data dumping. Data dumping by the salesperson might affect the opinion because the customer might change his mind to buy a specific product or postpond purchasing the product.
Answer:
$480,000
Explanation:
Data provided as per the question below:-
Net income = $380,000
Depreciation = $70,000
Decrease in accounts receivable = $30,000
The computation of cash provided by operating activities is shown below:-
= Net income + Depreciation + Decrease in accounts receivable
= $380,000 + $70,000 + $30,000
= $480,000
Therefore we applied the above formula.
Answer:
religion
race
Explanation:
Diversity in the workplace is a deliberate attempt to incorporate a wide range of different workers. It is an appreciation that each person or group of people is unique and has diverse characteristics. Workplace diversity results in the organization being accommodative to diverse cultures and different identities.
Workplace diversity embraces race, gender, age, sexual orientation, ethnic groups, religion, sexual orientation, and physical conditions. It also includes other unique differences between people.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
