Injurious consumption is negative in nature and not good at all for a person.
Utilizing resources to meet immediate needs and desires is known as consumption. It is contrasted with investing, which entails making purchases in order to acquire future revenue. Consumption is a key idea in economics and is also explored in a wide range of social sciences. Consumption is defined differently by various economic schools. Mainstream economists believe that only the final purchase of newly produced goods and services by individuals for immediate use qualifies as consumption; all other types of expenditure, including government spending, fixed investment, and intermediate consumption, are classified as separate categories (see Consumer choice). Many other economists define consumption as the whole of all economic activity that does not involve the creation, manufacturing, or selling of products and services.
learn more about consumption:
brainly.com/question/14933604
#SPJ4
....y...........d........ask....d.........d.......................uhhayhaysgsvdbshsjsjsjskkwowueydbdnfndjjdidjdfrrthuuuuytrrrrrrffftytttujmmmppp
MPL implies the extra output level, that is being produced by hiring an additional unit of labor.
So when the 16th worker is hired, the output level rises by = (340-325)
= 15 units.
In science education, a word problem is a mathematical exercise (including in a textbook, worksheet, or exam) wherein sizeable background statistics on the problem is offered in everyday language as opposed to in mathematical notation. As most phrase issues contain a narrative of a few sorts, they may be every now and then referred to as story issues and might range in the amount of technical language used.
To clear up trouble like this by algebra, one interprets the phrases into a gadget of equations, expressing the usage of mathematical variables and operations. For this problem, it's far more convenient to work out the solution first in minutes, and then convert it to hours.
Learn more about word problems here: brainly.com/question/1781657
#SPJ4
The best answer for this question would be:
<span>b. domestic producers of jet skis are worse off, domestic consumers of jet skis are better off, and the economic well-being of the country rises.
Because originally the jet skis came from the country they originated from so the quality is original and more trusted to the consumers. </span>
