Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
20 more tons of pollution into the air, and Firm B will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air.
Explanation:
It is given that :
Amount of tons of pollutants emitted by the two firms A and B earlier = 100 tons
Cost of pollutants by firm A = $ 200 per ton of pollutions
Cost of pollutants by firm B = $ 100 per ton of pollutions
Since the cost for eliminating the pollutants into the air is more for the firm A, the ticket is also more valuable for firm A. And therefore, firm A will buy all the tickets form firm B for an amount around $ 101 to $ 199. It will do so as to have a positive consumer and also to produce surplus.
So firm A will eliminate 20 tons of pollution and will use 80 ton capacity from the tickets. And for firm B, it will eliminate all 100 tons of pollutions.
Answer:
a. multiplies the activity-based overhead rates per cost driver by the number of cost drivers expected to be used per product.
Explanation:
Costing is the measurement of the cost of production of goods and services by assessing the fixed costs and variable costs associated with each step of production.
Generally, an activity-based costing uses multiple cost pools such as manufacturing cost or customer services and multiple cost drivers such as direct labor hours worked, number of changes used in engineering department, etc.
Cost pool is simply the amount of money spent by a firm on a particular activity.
Hence, to assign overhead costs to each product, the company multiplies the activity-based overhead rates per cost driver by the number of cost drivers expected to be used per product.
In activity-based costing, the activity rate for an activity cost pool is calculated by using the following formula;
Activity rate = total overhead cost/activity for the activity cost pool.
Answer:
If the demand for the product or services goes down
Explanation:
A reduction in demand for a good or service results in a decline in its price. As per the law of supply and demand, a decline in demand while holding other factors constant pushing the equilibrium price down. Reduced prices mean that the revenues obtained from the sales of the product or service will decline.
Hiring an extra worker when the demand is low will lead to losses. Low demand causes low prices, which implies that the cost of the new employee will be greater than the benefits obtained from the worker. A reduction in prices will mean that the marginal product of labor will be lower than the cost of labor.
Answer:
Talk About Your Topic (Not Just Your Brand) ...
Join Question & Answer Sessions. ...
Share Other People's Content. ...
5. Make Your Posts Visual. ...
Add Relevant Hashtags (#) to Your Posts. ...
Create Polls & Surveys. ...
Run Contests and Giveaways. ...
Post Frequently (and at optimal times)
Explanation:
