Answer:
15%
Step-by-step explanation:
56-32/32×100
24/32×100=75
100-75=15%
Any multiples of 4.5:1.5 would work because being proportional just depends on whether you can reduce to get the same answer of the first triangle. You could do anything like 9m and 3m or 27m and 9m
<span>What is the solution of the system? y=9x-2 y=7x+3
b.(5/2,41/2)
The table below shows the height (in inches) and weight (in pounds)of eight basketball players.
Height=67, 69, 70, 72, 74, 78, 79 Weight=183, 201, 206, 240, 253, 255 what is the correlation of the set of data? Round your answer to the nearest thousandth.
d.0.981
3.The table below shows the average height of a species of tree (in feet) after a certain number of years.
Years=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Height=2.1, 3.2, 6.8, 7.3, 11.2, 12.6, 13.4, 15.9 about how tall would you expect one of these trees to be after 22 years?
c.44.25ft
4.You use a line of best fit for a set of data to make a prediction about an unknown value. The correlation coefficient for your data set is 0.984. How confident can you be that your predicted value will be reasonably close to the actual value?
c.I can be very confident; it will be close, but it probably won't be exact.
</span>
Step-by-step explanation:
3cm on map = 45 km
1 cm on map = Xkm
Xkm = 45 / 3
Xkm = 15km
Therefore scale = 1:15000
