Answer:
Budgeted Income Statement for the year
Sales (820 units × $ 2,130) $1,746,600
Less Cost of Sales (820 units × $ 1,500) ($1,230,000)
Gross Profit $516,000
Less Operating Expenses :
Selling and administrative expense
Variable (820 units × $ 75) ($61,500)
Fixed ($400,000)
Operating Profit $54,500
Less Non - Operating Expenses :
Interest ( $29,000)
Net Income / (Loss) $25,500
Explanation:
Income Statement shows the company`s performance from its operations.
Income / (Loss) = Sales - Expenses.
Option (b) for a response. In order to keep the expenditure multiplier from exceeding 1, output must increase while consumption must decrease.
<h3>Spending multiplier: What does it tell you?</h3>
An economic indicator of the impact that changes in government spending and investment have on a nation's Gross Domestic Product is the expenditure multiplier, often known as the fiscal multiplier.
<h3>When the multiplier is negative, what does that mean?</h3>
The negative multiplier effect happens when a spending leak or initial withdrawal from the circular flow has further impacts and a larger final decline in real GDP.
<h3>Why does multiplier exceed 1?</h3>
The rise in the national product indicates a rise in national income. Consumption demand rises as a result, and businesses produce to satisfy it. As a result, the increase in investment is greater than the increase in national income and product. There is a multiplier effect that exceeds one.
Learn more about expenditure multiplier: brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. Wait for real-world events to confirm or refute the hypothesis.
B. Conduct one or more experiments.
Explanation:
Hypothesis by economists can lead to results that can decide economic policy. As such, it is important that they are tried and tested.
One way of testing a hypothesis is the standard method of conducting one of more experiments. These experiments will simulate world settings so that the experiment can be as close as possible to the real world.
Another method is to experience the hypothesis. The economist could just wait for events in the real world to either confirm or deny the hypothesis because the economy is dynamic and has been known to react uniquely to events that it otherwise should not have reacted to. It is therefore likely that it might react in a certain way that will enable the economist test their hypothesis.
I can get you caught up in a lot of lies
