This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
Answer:
Derived demand accelerates changes in markets.
Explanation:
Derived demand can be defined as the way in which the demand for a good or service tend to result from the demand for the related good or service and this occured when their is the demand for either good that are tangible or intangible goods where a market exists for both related goods and services.
In another word Derived demand occured in a situation where the demand for one good or service happens because of the want for another good or service Example is increase in the need for Shoes material or equipment because of the increase in the need for Shoes
because the factor of production by a company is dependent on the demand by consumers for the product produced by that company which is why the transition to become demand-driven is slowly occurring in many industries.
Hence, The factor that increases the volatility of demand in industrial markets is "Derived demand accelerates changes in markets"
Answer:
1. Make messages specific.
2. Abide by all copyright laws
3. Keep conversations casual but professional.
Explanation:
In the business environment, care should be taken when exchanging electronic communication. This is because, electronic messages can be intercepted and unfavorable findings, used to launch legal proceedings. Some things to do to avoid the legal perils of electronic communication, include;
1. Be specific: Electronic communications do not have to beat around the bush. Rather, they should be specific and straight to the point. Ideas must be communicated as accurately as possible. Employers must also be specific about their policies on electronic communication.
2. Abide by all copyright laws: When using electronic or printed materials from other sources, credit must be given to the owners of such materials to avoid lawsuits or accusations of piracy.
3. Keep conversations casual but professional: While, thoughts have to be communicated freely, they should however, not be overly casual. Professionalism must be maintained.
Care should be taken to avoid deleting messages unnecessarily as they may be requested for retrieval to validate accusations. Also, a rule of thumb is not to write messages when we can just talk to the person.
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
