Answer: tell them what you observe and sometimes you will have to reward them such as candies in order to show them that they did a splendid job. This will let them realize that they did a great job.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Class rank is a measure of how a student's performance compares to other students in his or her class. It is commonly also expressed as a percentile.
Answer:
carrot cake originated from such carrot puddings eaten by Europeans in the Middle Ages, when sugar and sweeteners were expensive and many people used carrots as a substitute for sugar.
Answer:
C. Father and his 35-year-old son investing in separate account.
Explanation:
Quantity discount when offered relates to one particular account, and not multiple accounts at a time.
In a transaction joint accounts are called as single person where there is only one main account in consideration and no secondary account exists for the same.
As in the given options,
Option A of husband and wife investing in a joint account means a single account is made of which both the husband and wife are controllers.
Option B is of UTMA account which is made for the benefit of the minor child, although involves two people that is parent and child, but is run individually by the parent and is a single account.
Further Option C provides for separate investment accounts , which means two different accounts and therefore are completely different one of father and another of son, thus do not qualify of quantity discount jointly, either of the one account can claim the quantity discount as a person.
Answer:
First of all, an auditor must be skeptical about the information that he/she is gathering and analyzing. They should try to get as much audit evidence as they can in order to form an opinion. But an auditor can also reasonably assure that there are no material misstatements, either intentional or not intentional.
Most auditor procedures are intended to discover unintentional misstatements, but intentional misstatements are very hard to discover because more than one individual (or even a very large group) might have colluded in order to conceal them. The auditor gets his information from the controller, internal auditor, and other people within the organization, but what if they all colluded in order to conceal their bad actions.
E.g. an auditor should check for shipping receipts to be complete, accurate and in order, but he/she relies on information given by the same people that he/she is evaluating. The auditor can conclude that the shipping reports are complete, but he/she cannot state that they are true and valid because he/she wasn't there.
