Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Answer:
Using single use plastics etc.
Explanation:
This is mostly a personal a question but some ways everyone contributes it by using single use plastics, not recycling or composting our waste, and excessive water use. All of these things contribute to land pollution and pollution in general. There are things you can do to try and keep yourself from contributing to pollution as much. You can use reusable silverware and other, usually, plastic objects. This is something like using a reusable straw, cup, packaging etc. You can take shorter showers and use less water when watering your lawn or other garden areas. You can also make sure to recycle and compost your waste. All of these things will greatly help with your contribution to pollution.
They shouldn't be bad for the ocean they are part of it.The only bad part is that they sting and they take up some big parts of the ocean.
I dont know but i’ma say E
It means that in the political world, when someone prominent is in power, they should answer for what they do, and also what they do not do to help out those around them and the ones that they are serving. By having transparency and not being corrupt this would make the political climate an easier place
