X+(x+2)+(x+4)= 66
3x+6=66
3x=60
x=20
20,22, and 24. so 20 is the answer
Total = 7 slices.
1student = 7/9 of a slice.
Total number of students:


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer: She will be able to hand out to 9 students.---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate of change refers to moving a certain amount of distance over a certain time period
rate of change= velocity in this case.
Answer:
The table is show clearly in the figure attached.
P(boy if favourite activity is swimming) = 8/17 = 0.47
P(girl if favourite activity is sport) = 7/27 = 0.26
P(girl if favourite activity is reading) = 4/6 = 0.67
P(boy if favourite activity is sport) = 20/27 = 0.74
P(favourite activity is swimming if a girl) = 9/20 = 0.45
P(favourite activity is reading if a boy) = 2/30 = 0.07
P(favourite activity is swimming if a boy) = 8/30 = 0.27
P(favourite activity is reading if a girl) = 4/20 = 0.2
Answer:
Now we can find the p value. Since we have a bilateral test the p value would be:
Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.1 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:
Do Not reject H0
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
n=200 represent the sample size slected
X=155 represent the cell phone owners used text messaging
estimated proportion of cell phone owners used text messaging
is the value to verify
represent the significance level
We need to conduct a z test for a proportion
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
System of hypothesis
We want to verify if the true proportion of cell phone owners used text messaging is different from 0.73 so then the system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic to check this hypothesis is given by:
(1)
Replacing the data given we got:
Now we can find the p value. Since we have a bilateral test the p value would be:
Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.1 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:
Do Not reject H0