Answer:
The p value would be given by:
Since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.64 at 5% of significance
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=145 represent the random sample taken
X=89 represent the number of people who believed the supermarket brand was as good as the national brand
estimated proportion of people who believed the supermarket brand was as good as the national brand
is the value to test
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true proportion is less than 0.64, the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info we got:
The p value would be given by:
Since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.64 at 5% of significance
Answer:
g = At/60
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
A = 60(g/t)
60(g/2) is a mistake in the question which the question has corrected in the comments)
A is the average for a professional hockey goalie.
g is the number of goals scored against the goalie.
t represents the time played in minutes.
Finding 'g':
A = 60(g/t)
can be written as A = (60*g)/t
Multiplying by 't' on both sides:
At = (60*g)*t/t
At = 60*g
Dividing by '60' on both sides:
At/60 = 60*g/60
At/60 = g
⇒ g = At/60
Answer:
oiu76543wzxcvbnm
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Total savings = $400
Ratio of savings of Blake and Josh = 3:1
To find:
The saving of each.
Solution:
Let the savings of Blake and Josh are 3x and x respectively.
According to the question,


Divide both sides by 4.

Now,
Savings of Blake = 3(100)=300
Savings of Josh =100
Therefore, the savings of Blake and Josh are $300 and $100 respectively.