1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masteriza [31]
4 years ago
6

How can an increase in biodiversity lead to an increase in ecosystem stability?

Social Studies
2 answers:
oksian1 [2.3K]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a more biodiverse ecosystem has a higher chance of adapting to species changes.

Explanation:

Thepotemich [5.8K]4 years ago
3 0
Here's an example to help explain; biodiversity is a the amount of species in a specific area the larger the number the more likely more will survive should one of these be killed off
say we have a system w/ grass bunnies and wolves not very diverse  so bunnies eat grass reproduce and are eaten by the wolves however say the bunnies die off somehow the wolves will then die because they no longer have an accessible source of prey because they don't eat grass 
now lets say that along with those three creatures there was also small rodents as well a large population of deer and other animals now when the rabbits die off the wolves have a separate food option allowing them to continue to survive until their original preferred comes back or they are forced to adapt to hunt their new prey
essentially with a larger biodiversity when one key animal dies it doesnt turn into a snowball effect because there are other animals that can fullfill the missing animals place in the food chain
You might be interested in
Among New Deal laws or programs that have become permanent parts of American life since the 1930s are Social Security, the Secur
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

What made these laws and programs popular were the countless benefits they provided to workers, which went beyond their wages, and still offered economic support if the worker were to lose his job for some reason.

These laws and programs could even end, but it would cause a great popular revolt, since it would take away several rights and benefits from the working class.

Explanation:

The New Deal was a set of strategies, laws and programs created after 1929, to alleviate the harms caused by the economic crisis to the country. The function of the New Deal was to intervene in the economy aggressively, but establishing a set of guidelines that would guarantee full employment to the population, in addition to economic support, in the case of dismissals, accidents and illnesses. It also provided economic benefits, bonuses, the possibility of increased wages, lower savings interest, among other factors that constitute many labor rights that we know today.

As the New Deal improved the lives of the working class, as well as the country's economy, all of these measures became very popular. They can be finalized over the years, but that would generate a revolt among the working class that could seriously damage the local economy.

6 0
4 years ago
Please help will give brainlest 20 mins left
Lunna [17]

Answer:

The Louisiana Purchase (French: Vente de la Louisiane 'Sale of Louisiana') was the acquisition of the territory of Louisiana by the United States from France in 1803. In return for fifteen million dollars, or approximately eighteen dollars per square mile, the United States nominally acquired a total of 828,000 sq mi (2,140,000 km2; 530,000,000 acres). However, France only controlled a small fraction of this area, most of it inhabited by American Indians; for the majority of the area, what the United States bought was the "preemptive" right to obtain Indian lands by treaty or by conquest, to the exclusion of other colonial powers.[1][2] The total cost of all subsequent treaties and financial settlements over the land has been estimated to be around 2.6 billion dollars.[1][2]

The Kingdom of France had controlled the Louisiana territory from 1699 until it was ceded to Spain in 1762. In 1800, Napoleon, the First Consul of the French Republic, regained ownership of Louisiana as part of a broader project to re-establish a French colonial empire in North America. However, France's failure to put down a revolt in Saint-Domingue, coupled with the prospect of renewed warfare with the United Kingdom, prompted Napoleon to consider selling Louisiana to the United States. Acquisition of Louisiana was a long-term goal of President Thomas Jefferson, who was especially eager to gain control of the crucial Mississippi River port of New Orleans. Jefferson tasked James Monroe and Robert R. Livingston with purchasing New Orleans. Negotiating with French Treasury Minister François Barbé-Marbois (who was acting on behalf of Napoleon), the American representatives quickly agreed to purchase the entire territory of Louisiana after it was offered. Overcoming the opposition of the Federalist Party, Jefferson and Secretary of State James Madison persuaded Congress to ratify and fund the Louisiana Purchase.

The Louisiana Purchase extended United States sovereignty across the Mississippi River, nearly doubling the nominal size of the country. The purchase included land from fifteen present U.S. states and two Canadian provinces, including the entirety of Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska; large portions of North Dakota and South Dakota; the area of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado east of the Continental Divide; the portion of Minnesota west of the Mississippi River; the northeastern section of New Mexico; northern portions of Texas; New Orleans and the portions of the present state of Louisiana west of the Mississippi River; and small portions of land within Alberta and Saskatchewan. At the time of the purchase, the territory of Louisiana's non-native population was around 60,000 inhabitants, of whom half were African slaves.[3] The western borders of the purchase were later settled by the 1819 Adams–Onís Treaty with Spain, while the northern borders of the purchase were adjusted by the Treaty of 1818 with Britain.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The narrative voice in this passage shows that Squeaky
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

not d i believe its C

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An uncontrollable pattern of thoughts is called a(an) 7 _______. Repeatedly performing irrational actions is called a(an) ______
Verdich [7]

Answer:

1. Obsession.

2. Compulsion.

3. Anxiety relievers.

Explanation:

An obsession are pattern of thoughts that are intrusive, which means that the individual has no control over them. They are usually images that are uncomfortable for the individual and or usually grotesque in nature and they produce distress to the individual.

A compulsion is a behavior that is repetitive that when performed it lowers the anxiety that the individual is experiencing associated with his/her obsession.

Example: Paul has an obsession with being violent and hurting his little brother. He knows he loves his brother but he has this recurrent images of him punching his brother and it causes him significant distress.

When he has the images, the only thing that eases his anxiety is counting his steps and he does it repeatedly during the day.

3 0
4 years ago
What agency has often been attacked by Congress and often had its policies watered down by the George W. Bush administration?
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

The agency that has often been attacked by Congress and often had its policies watered down by the George W. Bush administration was the Environmental Protection Agency.

Explanation:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the government agency responsible for health and the environment in the United States.

EPA was established by President Richard Nixon on December 2, 1970. In July 1970, the establishment was approved by the public as demand for cleaner water, air and land following environmental disasters such as the 1969 Cuyahoga River fire. Prior to the establishment of the EPA, the US government did not have structured instruments to address pollution that is hazardous to human health and the environment.

In the course of Donald Trump's presidency, who appears as a “climate skeptic” and announced in the election campaign to reduce environmental protection measures, the EPA was and is fundamentally changed to a business-friendly authority.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Would a person go east or west of the Rocky Mountains if they wanted to climb several extremely high mountains?
    13·2 answers
  • Abby is nervous as she begins her calculus final. she is not quite sure she can compete with the male students in her chemical e
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose OPEC announces it will increase production. Using supply and demand analysis to predict the effect of increased producti
    15·1 answer
  • Critically evaluate how some people defeat and frustrate the
    15·1 answer
  • What is a similarity between an embargo and a tariff?
    12·2 answers
  • How does Judaism differ from other religious groups?
    11·1 answer
  • Who did the Columbian exchange hurt<br>​
    6·2 answers
  • Why wouldn’t one type of economic system work for everybody?
    11·1 answer
  • Que es la dignidad humana
    5·1 answer
  • In narrative psychology, highly generative adults' scripts tend to feature a theme of?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!