1. past, generation to generation
3. Happy Ending
4. Endings (that's a guess)
5. Moral
6. Historical
7. Phenomenon
Answer:
<em><u>New York City comprises 5 boroughs sitting where the Hudson River meets the Atlantic Ocean. At its core is Manhattan, a densely populated borough that’s among the world’s major commercial, financial and cultural centers. Its iconic sites include skyscrapers such as the Empire State Building and sprawling Central Park. Broadway theater is staged in neon-lit Times Square </u></em>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> </u><u>MARK </u><u>ME</u><u> AS</u><u> BRAINLIST</u>
Answer: The Church as the most important European institution.
Explanation:
The Church, as the most important European medieval institution, spread its dogmatic norms in various ways. Since it was founded in the Western Roman Empire, it quickly spread to the rest of Europe. There are different ways to spread the influence of this institution. Conquering other peoples is one of those methods. The Church had a great influence on the rulers, so they promoted the Church and its ideals. The Church expanded in parallel with Catholicism, the missionary activity of church ministers the Church also expanded its influence. Throughout history, the Church has spread in an unpopular way, that is, through inquisitorial courts. The Inquisition used various violent methods to expand church influence.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
