1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jonny [76]
3 years ago
6

On February 1, 1778, how many soldiers at Valley Forge were sick? What percentage was this?

History
2 answers:
Ganezh [65]3 years ago
4 0
Total soldiers at Valley Forge: December 1777- 12,000 soldiers  February 1778-8,000 soldiers. Illness estimates during encampment: December 23, 1777- 2,898 soldiers,  February 1, 1778- 3,989 soldiers. Death estimates due to illness: December-June 1,800 to 2,500. 
SOVA2 [1]3 years ago
4 0
......3939 of the soldiers which was about a quarter of this
You might be interested in
What was a pro and con for the ww1 simulation?
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

<u>Pro</u>- It supplied an easy access to food, gun ammunition, and a place for soldiers to rest/sleep .

<u>Con</u>- It was very dirty, many fights occurred, many diseases, there was also rats that caused diseases to come, and form.

7 0
3 years ago
The two political parties in Mexico before the Texas Revolution were the _____ and the ______?
kondaur [170]

Answer:

texians and tejanos

Explanation:

go to www.britannica.con for more information

6 0
2 years ago
[30 Points] What connection is there between the Domino Theory and Proxy Wars?
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

When the cold war happened the domino theory came true;indochina became communist which proved the domino theory.Proxy wars are interventions in which a foreign state supports another place indirectly with a lot less support than direct intervention.There were many proxy wars that happened during the cold war for example when the USA supports a cold war based proxy war were the russian were attacking democratic based afghanistan and the afghanistans were getting support of democrats. The russians killed the president and put a russian loyal person in the afghanistan government.

4 0
3 years ago
How did mussolini​ guarantee​ that Fascism was the only​ political party by 1926?
romanna [79]

<span>Mussolini’s road to a dictatorship took much longer than Hitler’s in 1933. Hitler was appointed chancellor on January 30th 1933. By April 1st 1933, his power was such that, after the Enabling Act, Hitler could only be seen as the dictator of Nazi Germany regardless of Hindenburg’s presidency. </span><span>Mussolini’s public posturing and boasts did not guarantee loyalty in Italy – hence why it was so important for him to establish a relationship with the Roman Catholic Church. He only gained what could be described as dictatorial powers after the Lateran Treaty whereby he could guarantee loyalty from those Catholics who may well have not been supporters of the fascist state in Italy.</span>

<span>Mussolini took years to achieve what could be defined as a dictatorship. He achieved some semblance of power after the March on Rome in 1922 when he was appointed Prime Minister of Italy. But his government contained a mixture of men with different political beliefs – similar to Hitler’s position in January 1933.</span>

But his time in power almost collapsed after the murder of Matteotti when great anger gripped Italy. If he had been a true dictator in 1922, then such an uproar would never have happened as his enemies and the Italian people in general would have been cowed into submission.

Mussolini started his time in power by buying support from both the working class and the industrial bosses.

<span>The workers were promised an eight hour day while an enquiry into the profits made by the industrialists during World War One was dropped. The rich benefited from a reduction in death duties – now, under Mussolini, more of what someone had earned during their lifetime, went to their family and not the government. To get support from the Roman Catholic Church, religious education was made compulsory in all elementary schools.</span>

<span>These policies can be seen as an attempt to ‘buy’ support. As an example, in 1933 Hitler introduced workers holidays into Germany (similar to a bank holiday). This was very popular. He then almost immediately banned trade unions which protected workers rights. Any protests over this were banned as a result of the Enabling Act – Hitler did not bargain with anyone. Mussolini was not in a position whereby he could assert his authority and it is probable that the extent of his dictatorial powers never did equal those acquired by Hitler.</span>

Mussolini had never intended to share power with the liberals who were in the government. He introduced a Fascist Grand Council which would decide policy for Italy without consulting the non-fascists in the government first.

<span>In February 1923, Mussolini and the Fascist Grand Council introduced the Acerbo Law. This law changed election results. Now if one party got just 25% (or more) of the votes cast in an election, they would get66%of the seats in parliament.</span>

When it came for Parliament to vote on the Acerbo Law, many politicians agreed to a law that would almost certainly end their political careers if they were not fascists. Why did they do this?

The gallery in the hall in which the politicians voted was filled with armed fascist thugs who had a good view of anybody who spoke out against the law. The threat was clear and real. If you voted for the law, you would be fine. If you did not, then you were certainly in danger from fascist thugs.

<span>Mussolini did say in the spring of 1924 that “a good beating did not hurt anyone.”</span>

5 0
3 years ago
(50 Points + Brainliest answer if it's detailed, original, and clear.)
nadezda [96]
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force. 

That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.

The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference. 

That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further. 

Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how  Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did religion influence the daily lives of people in the high middle ages
    15·2 answers
  • What was one way the Chinese tried to protect themselves during the Warring Sates period?
    6·1 answer
  • The Black Hawk War began because... (20 points)
    15·2 answers
  • In a two-party system, the leaders of the two major parties would most likely support:
    8·1 answer
  • Thanks to this us president, the Panama Canal was built to improve trade and travel
    9·2 answers
  • In what ways were the lives of American people affected by the New Deal?​
    14·2 answers
  • How do you explain all the changes to society that occurred after the Great War?
    15·1 answer
  • qué festividades o costumbres actuales de Colombia se llevan a cabo gracias a la herencia de los antiguos esclavos
    12·1 answer
  • 2+2=?<br>for those who didnt get to answer the last​
    15·2 answers
  • DOCUMENT 5:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!