I believe this is due to the opinions which vary from person to person. In my experience I believe homophobia to be a cause of insecurity and fear of difference.
•Throughout history, people who were different from the majority of others were often tormented and blamed for many things. This fear of differences can start at childhood teasing, but can also lead to worse things. Further, it is not necessarily that people dislike or hate the differences, but it could be a matter of status, or power. Some people enjoy feeling better than other people, regardless of reason.
•Another reason is that it’s sometimes considered politically incorrect to talk about, or socially awkward. Not talking about it leads to not understanding it. Not understanding it may cause people to rely on stereotypes, which may be poor representations of homosexuality.
•The most common reason I’ve seen for homophobia is religion. Many read scriptures and think they present as a homophobic statement.
•Some believe it is necessary for the human race to reproduce which homosexual couples usually can’t.
•Believing that children shouldn’t be around two people of the same gender for too long. Like if they had two dads or moms.
The bacb's codes of ethics for rbts has three sections: responsible conduct, responsibility to clients, and competence and service delivery.
<h3>What various ethical frameworks are there?</h3>
Deontological, teleological, and virtue-based ethics are the three broad categories into which ethical systems can generally be divided. Due to their exclusive attention to an individual's behaviors, the first two are regarded as deontic or action-based theories of morality.
<h3>Which three categories go under ethics?</h3>
There are three different categories of ethical theories: duty-based, end-based, and intuition-based. These three categories of ethics aim to define the norms, social norms, and moral principles that direct or ought to direct human behavior. Basics of Ethics
Learn more about Code of Ethics:
brainly.com/question/27735104
#SPJ4
Warring Lords, Rebellions and Samurai, to 1598 | Tokugawa Japan, to 1700 ... the last great Buddhist fortress-monastery in Osaka in 1580, he became master of all of central Japan.
Answer:
not a violation of antitrust law
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this refusal is most likely not a violation of antitrust law. That is because these laws are designed to promote competition. Therefore since they are one of many producers, refusal to sell is not a violation. The Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation can obtain another provider.
To keep the world safe...... idk tho
