<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
Remember that a controlled variable is a variable that stays the same thoughout the experiment.
it wouldn't be a. because two different wires were used
the final length of the wax would be your dependent variable, so it wouldn't be c.
the thermal conductivity is the independent variable so it isn't d.
the original length of the wax was the same for both.
So B is your answer.
1.chloroplasts
2. Centriole
3.membrane
4 clotoplasm
7 mitochondria
8 cellulose
10 ribosome
11 vacuoles
12 cytoplasm
13 chromatin
14 diffusion
15. I'm not sure sorry
Delta and it is called this because it looks like the Delta symbol
The correct answer is going to be <span>C. It is the continuous movement of water under, on or above the Earth's surface</span>
