Answer:
Supplier's quotation (2,400 x $6.25) 150,000
Less: Relevant cost of production:
Direct material (2,400 x $31) 74,400
Direct labour (2,400 x $18) 43,200
Variable overhead (2,400 x $9) <u>21,600</u> <u>139,200</u>
Savings <u> 10,800</u>
The parts should be produced in-house since the relevant cost of production is lower than supplier's quotation.
Explanation:
In this case, we need to compare supplier's quotation to the relevant cost of production. The price of $6.25 above was computed by dividing the total price charged by the supplier by the number of parts. Moreso, the relevant cost of production is obtained by the aggregate of direct material, direct labour and variable overhead.
Answer: Inelastic
Explanation:
Price elasticity could be defined as when the desire for a product changes as it's price changes. When people's desires changes or they are no longer interested as the price for the commodity goes up. Inelastic demand is defined as when the buyers demand does not change or is not influenced as the price of the commodity goes up, rather the demand decreases than increasing. The price rise will increase city revenues if the elasticity of demand for electricity and natural gas is elastic.
I believe the correct answer is true. <span>For every decision you make, there is a trade-off. A decision is always accompanied by two choices. One of these choices is the better. Every choice has its own advantage and disadvantage so that a trade off will always be present. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer:
-$30,250 favorable
Explanation:
labor efficiency variance = (standard quantity - actual quantity) x standard labor cost
- actual quantity = 7,700 hours
- standard quantity = 9.9 hours x 1,000 units = 9,900
- standard labor cost = $13.70
labor efficiency variance = (7,700 - 9,900) x $13.70 = -$30,250 favorable variance
the variance is favorable, because less hours were actually used than forecasted
Answer:
For a better valuation of trade.
Explanation:
Mackay could have left out this list and simply said that the root cost 2500 florins. But he gave the list to have a better understanding of the valuation of trade. Now, the cost could have simply being layed out. But then this list helped helped to give a better perspective of the valuation of the bulb and also how it could be used to replace money