Answer: B. bike boxes.
Answer choices are:
A. sharrows.
B. bike boxes.
C. bike lanes.
D .all of the above
<span>All of the above are designated places for the exclusive use of bicycles. A sharrow is a street marking installed at locations to indicate where people should preferably cycle while a bike lane is just a portion of the roadway for the exclusive use of the bicyclists. A bike box is <span>a special intersection that allows bicyclists ahead of motor vehicle traffic make it safer for them to turn or cross. </span></span>
Answer:
correct answer is option a and d
The correct answer is the Fiedler’s contingency theory. This
is a type of contingency theory by which it shows or focuses on the
effectiveness of leadership that are likely to base on a particular situation and
the numerous factors that may take place.
Answer:
ach status. Also, provide one example of role conflict that you have experienced and one example of role strain. Be sure you are clear on the meaning of each of these terms before beginning this assignment AND to double check that you identify them correctly in your response before clicking submit.
PART TWO: Consider the importance of status and role, and in several complete, well-developed sentences (Approximately 100-125 words), explain Some specific ways how/why statuses and roles are important for individuals AND for society as a whole.
Explanation:
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
