Answer:
Only when there is explicit danger for the nation and its people.
Explanation:
It takes an acrobatic politician and government to find the perfect balance between freedom and security; when you try to secure the latter the former is abused.
If we look at the coronavirus pandemic we see that, when there is real danger, people in general are willing to give up some of their freedom.
But it becomes more problematic when there is civil unrest. To start with, how to define or measure civil unrest is a bit tricky and more difficult than counting coronavirus cases and deaths. Secondly, civil unrest, like what is happening in Minneapolis right now, is all about the freedom to exercise the right to express your grieves with the way a nation is dealing (or ignoring) a problem. And this particular problem the U.S. have with its Afroamerican population should be dealt with, not by giving the police more power.
<span>demand from developing countries</span>
Answer:
i do believe the answer is C
Explanation:
sorry if its wrong but i dont think it is
Answer:
Low Country residents lost trade opportunites with Great Britain, and many planters owed money to creditors. ... Up Country residents were wealthy plantation owners; Low Country residents were primarily woodsmen and traders.
Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the question: Based on your learning, you would use the ____ dialectic approach to explain how both John and his friends are correct in their expectations of intercultural interaction, would be: the cultural-individual dialectic.
Explanation:
The dialectic approach is a means by which differences in intercultural communication can be overcome by understanding that there is much more to intercultural exchanges than those things that set us apart, or make us different from others. The cultural-individual dialectic, as one of the many types that exist, allow us to bridge the gap that exists between what a culture´s norms places as expectations on us, and the reality that we are as people, as individuals, especially when we interrelate with others. In the case of John and his friends, both come from a culture that praises intercultural exchange, and thus the friends are joyous about John having gotten that exchange to China. John, as part of the same culture, adopts the view of his society, as he applied to the program and won the scholarship, but his view on the matter as an individual clashes with that of the bigger group because he thinks differently and interprets the opportunity differently. The cultural-individual dialectic would allow us to settle the difference and show them that both sides have a point that needs to be taken into accout.