Answer:
NPV = $49,234.16
Explanation:
The Net present value (NPV) is the difference between the Present value (PV) of cash inflows and the PV of cash outflows. A positive NPV implies a good investment project and a negative figure implies the opposite.
NPV of an investment:
NPV = PV of Cash inflows - PV of cash outflow
<em>Present value of cash inflows:</em>
A × 1-(1+r)^(-n)/r
A- annual cash inflow-20,000 r-rate of return-10%, n-number of years-6
PV of cash flow = 20,000 × (1.1)^(-6)/0.1 = 87,105.21399
<em>PV of scrap value</em>
F× (1+r)^(-n)
F- scrap value
= 2,000× 1.1^(-6)= 1,128.94
Initial cost = $39,000
NPV = 87,105.21399 + 1,128.94 -39,000= $49,234.16
NPV = $49,234.16
Answer:
The aggregate amount received for the quarter amounts to $103.4
Explanation:
The computation of aggregate amount received for the quarter is as follows:
Aggregate amount received for the quarter = Number of Shares owned × Price Paid per share
where
Number of Shares owned is 220 shares
Price paid per share is $0.47 per share
Putting the values above:
= 220 × $0.47
= $103.4
Answer:
c. quotas
Explanation:
Quotas refer to minimum criteria to be fulfilled to meet the requirement.
Accordingly in the given instance Rita is given certain quotas to fulfill to meet the job. For this she has to sell at least 5 television sets, which shall be flat screen.
Also she must identify at least 10 potential customers who shall buy flat screen sets in near future.
These are basic conditions which are called quotas.
Answer:
$ 9,387.50
Explanation:
An asset is any item that the owner considers valuable.
Shares , the cars and figurines are assets as Latoya can attach a value to them.
Total value of the shares = 50 x 35.75 = 1, 787.5
Value of the car = $5,600
Figurines = $ 2,000
Total value of assets = 1,787.50+ $5,600 + $2,000
=$ 9,387.50
I believe the answer is: inductive reasoning
In inductive reasoning, the premises would be viewed as some sort of supply of evidence for the general conclusion. In the example above,
"all professional athletes earn a lot of money" is the premise that is used as some sort of evidence for " wes makes a lot of money", which is the speaker's conclusion.