Answer:
Glendale was not able to prove that the ordinance directly advanced the claim of interest in public safety.
Explanation:
Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale is a case in which Christopher Pagan wanted to sell his car and put a for sale sign on it and parked it on a city street. Because of this, he received a notice that his car was in violation of a city ordinance that didn't allow him to do this. He filed a suit claiming that the law was unconstitutional because it violated his First Amendment right. Pagan won because Glendale couldn't provide enough evidence that the ordinance had the goal of avoiding a potential harm. It was considered that the law didn't serve a government interest in public safety.
Answer:
d. openness to experience
Explanation:
<u>People who are more open to new experiences and ideas are easier to hear and receive a persuasive argument in the discussion. </u>
Those who are<em> more open to new experiences</em>, <em>who enjoy learning</em> and <em>have more need to evaluate things</em> will take the arguments into the account, review them, and, if they prove to be useful and true for them, to accept them.
People who show the need for consistency and high attitude importance are more difficult to persuade. <u>Those who are more closed off and who have their mindset on things are always more difficult to revive the well-rounded argument. </u>
In what context are you reffering to?
