Explanation:
French diplomats demanded large bribes and loans" was the one reason among the following choices given in the question that US and French diplomats failed to smooth relations between the two countries in 1796. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "d".
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The United States presidents use these methods of communication in the following ways. I am going to include an example to persuade the public in the answer.
Method 1: Rallies.
One of the best methods of communication because the president appears in person, right there, in front of his followers, addressing them or thanking them for their support. It is a great chance to greet them and have direct interaction with them.
Method 2: Social Media.
The president can have immediate communication with the citizens or his followers through social media. No intermediaries. The president interacting with them at the right precise moment.
Method 3: Press conferences.
An excellent way to address the national media to answer questions on important issues or promote his executive agenda.
Method 4: Televised interviews.
A more direct and personal way to establish a conversation with major TV news programs.
Method 5: The State of the Union address
The official way to address Congress and the nation to inform about the situation in the United States.
The answer is: The middle colonies experienced economic growth as cities such as New York and Philadelphia became centers of trade.
When both new york and Philadelphia become the centers of trade, a lot of investors became interested to inject their capital into these two cities.
This created a lot of job opportunities in both of these cities, making the middle colonies around them to experience massive economic growth and increase in the number of modern infrastructures.
The declarations of the letter to the U.S. Congress by the economists concerning the bailouts are evidently specified the disagreement of the source of the letter about the GM bailout. The document stated that the bailout would disrupt the notion of free market in U.S. and that it will break the people who held in the free market (Velasquez, 2012). Also, the bailout and government interference will shift the free market economy into socialism (ibid). The economists and other parties which is convoluted in the making of the letter, sustained the free market economy. They do not approve on government interruption as it disrupts the mechanism of the market that is free of any interference particularly from the government. The sources of the letter thought that it was GM’s own accountability to bail itself out of the insolvency. The bankruptcy was a consequence of bad management of the company and it was its own accountability to resolve the matter. The interference by the government will move the market mechanism. The bailout will disturb the equal right of the people of life, freedom, and possessions as what John Locke’s notion. Furthermore, government meddling will also lower the public’s safety based on Adam Smith’s theory.
