Answer:
Right now marcantuone and robert gieson ought not be held at risk for what the drycleaner inhabitants did.Because there was no release of perilous substance during their ownership.The chlorinated dissolvable pollution issue right now the aftereffect of dry cleaning activity led preceding the condemnee's acquisition of the property.There was no proof of a release of unsafe substance during the time of condemnee's ownership.The sullying was not found until after the condemner had procured the title to the property in the judgement activity.
As indicated by the spill demonstration the obligation is vested on a condemner who bought debased property and didn't attempt any assessment or examination at the hour of procurement.
False that just don’t make since lol
Answer:
a. $(8000)
b. Company should choose alternative 1 and make bottles.
Explanation:
Particulars Make Bottles Buy Bottles Differential
Alternative 1 Alternative 2
Purchase Price 0 $37 $(37)
Freight Charges 0 $4 $(4)
Variable cost $33 $33
Fixed Cost $17 $17 0
Cost per unit $50 $58 $(8)
Income / (Loss) $50,000 $58,000 $(8,000)
b. The company should choose alternative 1 and make bottles. The buying of bottles will cost company loss of $8,000.
Answer:
Material requirements planning
Explanation: This is defined as the detailed planning process for components and parts to support the master production scheme
A computer-based materials management system that calculates the exact quantities, need dates, and planned order releases for subassemblies, component part and materials required to manufacture a final product