Answer:
The idea of restricting international trade, otherwise known as trade protectionism, is considered wrong because the world today is centered around globalisation.
Explanation:
Countries desire to increase revenue for their local governments. They impose trade barriers through the imposition of tariffs, embargos, voluntary export restraints and so on, with the aim of reducing competition from foreign industries so as to promote local companies. However, this usually produces adverse effects, heavier than the intended benefits. Such effects include reducing the wide variety of goods and services available to the population, reducing the number of jobs due to reduction in number of foreign companies, increasing monopoly power which will in turn lead to higher prices being charged by monopolists. Indirectly, restricting international trade also affects international relations.
Answer: The Romans
Explanation: I think the Romans were the greatest of the civilizations up until this point in history. Even after its fall, Rome still lived, not only with the Byzantine empire, but also on the influence it has left on our current world. The Romans were very advanced, and we have them to thank for our democratic form of government. Not only that, but they were skilled in warfare, more so than other civilization. They were able to control all of the Mediterranean Sea. With these skills, and the imprint they have left on Europe and the world, it can be concluded that Rome is therefore the greatest civilization thus far.
Answer:
The experimental group (the children who watch the woman) were more likely to hit to doll than those who did not watch the act.
Explanation:
This experiment is a demonstration of Bandura's observational learning theories. It states that people learn through observation and imitation.
While other theories such as behaviourism stated that individuals needed reinforcements to act, observational learning explained that humans need models, such as a parent or teacher, as a important part of the learning process.
Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the Northern and Southern regions of the United States struggled to find a mutually acceptable solution to the slavery issue. Unfortunately, little common ground could be found. The cotton-oriented economy of the American South continued to rest on the shoulders of its slaves, even as Northern calls for the abolition of slavery grew louder. At the same time, the industrialization of the North continued. During the 1820s and 1830s, the different needs of the two regions' economies further strained relations between the North and the South.
The first half of the nineteenth century was also a period of great expansion for the United States. In 1803, the nation purchased the vast Louisiana Territory from France, and in the late 1840s it wrestled Texas and five hundred thousand square miles of land in western North America from Mexico. But in both of these cases, the addition of new land deepened the bitterness between the North and the South. As each new state and territory was admitted into the Union, the two sides engaged in furious arguments over whether slavery would be permitted within its borders. Urged on by the growing abolitionist movement, Northerners became determined to halt the spread of slavery. Southern slaveholders fiercely resisted, however, because they knew that they would be unable to stop antislavery legislation in the U.S. Congress if some of the new states were not admitted as slave states. In order to preserve the Union, the two sides agreed to a series of compromis
When ya could seee the other car threw y’all blind spot
