The end of the Roman Republic was attributed to the instability of the Roman economy and conflicts within the military and the ruling families. The Republic should have moved towards absolute democracy instead of relying on the royal families to govern the country.
Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and Rolling Adjustment are all terms for "recession", otherwise known as economic downturns.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Roosevelt recession relates to a time from mid-1937 to 1938 when the Great Depression economic recovery briefly halted, for a span of around 13 months. In 1958, the recession, also recognized as the Eisenhower Crisis, was a significant decline in the global economy. The recession's impact extended to Europe and Canada outside the boundaries of the United States, forcing several companies to close down.
When the downturn impacts only specific aspects of the economy at a period, is understood as rolling adjustment. The recession will 'roll' into another aspect of the economy as one sector joins reconstruction. All in all, it occur irrespective of national or state-wide economic contraction, and the consequences might not be on national economic steps, for an instance GDP.
<span>"they have promoted the expansion of this power by consistently ruling that the meaning of commerce, whether international or interstate. Its exceeding just by buying and selling goods."
hope this helps!</span>
Answer: military history of the Soviet Union began in the days following the 1917 October Revolution that brought the Bolsheviks to power. In 1918 the new government formed the Red Army, which then defeated its various internal enemies in the Russian Civil War of 1917–22. The years 1918–21 saw defeats for the Red Army in the Polish–Soviet War (1919–21) and in independence wars for Estonia (1918–20), Latvia (1918–20) and Lithuania (1918–19). History of the Soviet Union (1982–91).
Explanation:
The correct answer is:
a. Cotton Mills
During the Reconstruction Era, Cotton became a protagonist in the industrial growth of the Southern States. Southern capitalists sank Money into cotton rather than factories or land. More precisely, they invested in slaves; the average slave owner held almost two-thirds of his wealth in slaves in 1860, much less than he held in land.
