1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vanyuwa [196]
3 years ago
9

Why did the colonists value their rights so highly?

History
2 answers:
Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago
6 0
The colonists valued their rights so highly because the king of England didn’t give them any freedoms or rights. The colonists didn’t have any of the rights that we have today so they fought hard to make sure everyone was treated fairly. It’s the only just thing to do.
horsena [70]3 years ago
4 0

<em>Colonists valued their rights so highly because they wanted to be able to have power in their defence and to make sure that they felt they were being treated the way they believed was good. Rights are what the colonists used to protect themselves and also it brought a lot higher form of safety among the colonists.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

You might be interested in
How did Lester Maddox surprise many Georgians in his role as governor?
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are a scout in the 1830s who makes a living by guiding settlers to Oregon. Write a two-paragraph "advertisement" telling peo
Lesechka [4]

In the 1830s, several parties of Americans traveled to Oregon, further establishing the Oregon Trail. Many of these emigrants were missionaries seeking to convert natives to Christianity. Jason Lee was the first, traveling in Nathaniel Jarvis Wyeth's party in 1833 and establishing the Oregon Mission in the Willamette Valley; the Whitmans and Spaldings arrived in 1836, establishing the Whitman Mission east of the Cascades. In 1839 the Peoria Party embarked for Oregon from Illinois.

In 1841, wealthy master trapper and entrepreneur Ewing Young died without a will, and there was no system to probate his estate. A probate government was proposed at a meeting after Young's funeral. Doctor Ira Babcock of Jason Lee's Methodist Mission was elected Supreme Judge. Babcock chaired two meetings in 1842 at Champoeg (halfway between Lee's mission and Oregon City) to discuss wolves and other animals of contemporary concern. These meetings were precursors to an all-citizen meeting in 1843, which instituted a provisional government headed by an executive committee made up of David Hill, Alanson Beers, and Joseph Gale. This government was the first acting public government of the Oregon Country before American annexation.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From where does check ans balance came from
EastWind [94]
Checks and Balances

The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful. Each branch “checks” the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them. How does this system of checks and balances work?

The process of how laws are made (see the following page) is a good example of checks and balances in action. First, the legislative branch introduces and votes on a bill. The bill then goes to the executive branch, where the President decides whether he thinks the bill is good for the country. If so, he signs the bill, and it becomes a law.

If the President does not believe the bill is good for the country, he does not sign it. This is called a veto. But the legislative branch gets another chance. With enough votes, the legislative branch can override the executive branch's veto, and the bill becomes a law.

Once a law is in place, the people of the country can test it through the court system, which is under the control of the judicial branch. If someone believes a law is unfair, a lawsuit can be filed. Lawyers then make arguments for and against the case, and a judge decides which side has presented the most convincing arguments. The side that loses can choose to appeal to a higher court, and may eventually reach the highest court of all, the Supreme Court.

If the legislative branch does not agree with the way in which the judicial branch has interpreted the law, they can introduce a new piece of legislation, and the process starts all over again.

<span>Fact Monster™</span>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Hundered Years' War affect standing armies?
alekssr [168]
How did the Hundred Years' War affect standing armies? It increased their power. ... Advanced weapons led to a stronger aristocracy and weaker armies. Advanced weapons led to stronger armies and weaker monarchies.
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the Emancipation Proclamation score big in Europe? Most nations did not want to abolish slavery. Many nations had alread
Vladimir [108]
Many nations had already abolished slavery.
 Let me know if you want to know why.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the best summary of the first paragraph of "how we entered world war i"? the united states was not considered a great po
    14·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Camp David Accords?
    12·1 answer
  • Which region did not see significant islamic expansion?
    5·2 answers
  • Why is hammurabis code a great babylonian achievement
    15·2 answers
  • C) In which part of present-day India was the Pratihara kingdom located?​
    11·1 answer
  • Question 4 of 25
    9·2 answers
  • What was true about the gulf of Tonkin incident?
    14·1 answer
  • What was a factor keeping europeans out of interior africa unitl the late 1800
    8·1 answer
  • 4. What were some differences
    13·1 answer
  • A solution to the slavery crisis suggested by a senator by which territorial residents, not congress, would decide slavery's fat
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!