How does the federal court system decide which criminal cases to take?

1 answer:

4 0

The correct answer is B), a grand jury decides if each case has merit. The federal court system decides which criminal cases to take after the U.S. attorney's office presents the evidence before the grand jury and they decide that it is enough for the defendant to face trial. It is important to note that a criminal case can only be started by a government agency. The information can be found in the United States Court's wep page: http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/types-cases/criminal-cases

You might be interested in

What words or phrases stand out to you about power?

photoshop1234 [79]

A dictator or a monarchy

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following are very powerful negative labels that change a person's identity?

AnnZ [28]

The answer is C)Stigmas

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify and explain which of the four regions of the U.S. has the best potential for wind energy.

gladu [14]

Answer:

Open plains and anywhere with moors

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

In Smyrna, Georgia, the people elect a mayor, but the city council has most of the governing power. The mayor serves as the figu

kumpel [21]

Answer:

i believe it is D

Explanation:

because a weak mayor system would mean that 0 power is in the mayors hands

strong mayor system would be the opposite- where all power resides in the mayors hands

a speacial purpose system would basically mean that each power holds a different purpose

and a council manager system means that tye power only has control over the council...and the council is one of the powers

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Derek likes to bully his little brother Matt. Their mother begins to give Derek the mild punishment of a stern look every time D

Dimas [21]

Answer:

Because there was insufficient external justification for resisting, Derek began to devalue the forbidden activity

Explanation:

Insufficient theories of punishment are related to the dissonance in which a person feels the lack of sufficient external justification. This is the justification for devaluing for the forbidden things. There was an experiment was done by Aron-son and Carl-smith.

They threaten the child with mild or severe punishment when they play with their favored toys. So that none of the children play with their favored toy when they left alone. But the child who was less threatening has been played with toy more than the children who threatened more.

8 0

3 years ago