1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
5

Roslyn is a food buyer for Organic Cornucopia Food Company when she decides to go into business for herself as Roslyn’s Kitchen.

She contacts Organic’s suppliers, offering to buy their entire harvest for the next year, and Organic’s customers, offering to sell her products for less than her ex-employer’s prices. Has Roslyn violated any of the intellectual property rights discussed in this chapter? Explain.
Business
1 answer:
Liula [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Of course she has, Roslyn stole Organic Cornucopia's trade secrets. She is specifically contacting their vendors and customers.

Even though you cannot register a list of vendors or customers, they are considered trade secrets that must not be given away or used against the company by their employees or former employees in this case. Even if Roslyn's contract with Organic Cornucopia didn't include a trade secrets clause, it is reasonable that employees cannot act against the company using them and she was very direct, there are no excuses here.

You might be interested in
The probability of low demand is estimated to be 0.20. The after-tax net present value of the benefits from purchasing the two m
kondaur [170]

Answer:  a)The decision tree is attached as a document to this question.

b)$140000

Here is the complete question:

. A manager is trying to decide whether to buy one machine or two. If only one is purchased and demand proves to be excessive, the second machine can be purchased later. Some sales will be lost, however, because the lead time for purchasing this type of machine is 6 months. In addition, the cost per machine will be lower if both are purchased at the same time. The probability of low demand is estimated to be 0.20. The after-tax net present value of the benefits from purchasing the two machines together is $90,000 if demand is low and $180,000 if demand is high.

If one machine is purchased and demand is low, the net present value is $120,000. If demand is high, the manager has three options. Doing nothing has a net present value of $120,000; subcontracting, $160,000; and buying the second machines, $140,000.

a. Draw the decision tree for this problem.

b. Use the decision tree to determine how many machines the company should buy initially and give the expected payoff for this alternative.

Explanation:

Concepts and reason

The expected value of perfect information (EVPI)= EPPI - EP

(EPPI) =expected payoff with perfect information

(EP)= maximum expected payoff  computed under uncertainty.

Fundamentals

The expected payoff = P₁X₁ + P₂X₂ +....PnXn,

The formula for the expected payoff is, E(X) = ΣxΡ(x)

Suppose you have a set of corresponding probabilities for playing your pure strategies = Pn

where the probabilities must all be greater than or equal to zero and they all sum to one.

b) the values at node 4 = $120000, $140000 and $160000

EV =maximum(node4)

=max($120000, $140000 , $160000)

=$140000

expected payoff at node 4 = $140000

3 0
3 years ago
In Japan, suppose Honda’s export price per vehicle is ¥4,000,000 and that the exchange rate is ¥125/$. The one-year Japanese yen
NemiM [27]

Answer:$31,379

Explanation:Applying the

Fishers international effect

1+Ic/1+Ib=S1/S0

Where Ib represents the interest rate in base country which is Japan in this case

Ic represents the interest rate in counter country in this case,US

S0 is the base spot rate or exchange rate at the moment while S1 is the spot rate at the end of the coming year

Ic =3%=0.03

Ib=1%=0.01

So=145

Substituting in the formula

1.03/1.01=S1/125

Cross multiplying

S1=125(1.03)/1.01=127.475

So price in US at spot 127.475 will be ¥4,000,000/127.475=$31,379

5 0
3 years ago
Cobe Company has already manufactured 19,000 units of Product A at a cost of $25 per unit. The 19,000 units can be sold at this
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

Incremental net income from further processing is  $566,600

Explanation:

First of all, it would be necessary to compute profit from selling the product at cut off point and profit when it is further processed in order to determine whether or not it is worth processing further:

Sales revenue                                        $400,000

cost of production(19,000*$25)            $475,000

Loss from selling                                  ($75,000)

Further processing:

sales revenue

Product B(5200*$108)                       $561,600

Product C(11,000*$55)                       $605,000

Total revenue                                     $1,166,600

total cost

cost of production                              ($475,000)

cost of further processing                 ($200,000)

total costs                                           ($675,000)

Profit                                                    $491600

By further processing the incremental net profit is $566,600 ($491,600-(-$75000)

4 0
3 years ago
Lee is considering buying one of two newly-issued bonds. Bond A is a twenty-year, 7.5% coupon bond that is non-callable. Bond B
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Multiple choices below are missing:

A) purchase Bond A

B) purchase Bond B

C) purchase neither A nor B at this time

D) negotiate a higher rate on Bond A

The correct option is A,purchase bond A.

Explanation:

By purchasing Bond A,Lee is assured interest payment of 7.5% for a period of twenty years,hence the issuer cannot call the bond if interest rate drops by 2% in order to issue a lower interest-bearing bond which would be cheaper cost-wise.

However, if Lee purchases Bond B with current coupon of 8.25%,the interest is only guaranteed for a period of two years,since the issuer has the prerogative of calling back the bond after two years should interest fall in order to issue another bond that commands lower interest rate.

6 0
3 years ago
Entity B bought equipment for $240,000 on January 1, 2021. It estimated the useful life to be 3 years with no salvage value, and
mezya [45]

Answer:

Part 1

Revised depreciation expense =  $32,000

Part 2

The entry to record depreciation expense :

Debit : Depreciation Expense $32,000

Credit : Accumulated Depreciation $32,000

Explanation:

Straight line method charges a fixed depreciation charge over the year of use of an asset.

<em>Depreciation expense = (Cost - Salvage Value) ÷ Estimated Useful Life</em>

2021

Depreciation expense = $80,000

2022

Old Depreciation expense = $80,000

New Depreciation expense = Depreciable Amount ÷ Remaining Useful Life

                                              = ($240,000 - $80,000) ÷ 5

                                              = $32,000

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An 85-year old retired client has living expenses of $15,000 per year. His portfolio is currently allocated: 50% Money Market Fu
    13·1 answer
  • A leftward shift of the supply curve for oil in the united states is most likely to result from:
    14·1 answer
  • Eleven years ago, Lynn Inc. purchased a warehouse for $315,000. This year, the corporation sold the warehouse to Firm D for $80,
    9·1 answer
  • In which category do commodities belong?
    7·2 answers
  • Zeibart Company purchases equipment for $225,000 on July 1, 2016, with an estimated useful life of 10 years and expected salvage
    7·1 answer
  • Activity A B C D E F G H Time 5 3 7 6 7 3 10 8 a. Identify the critical path. b. How much time will be needed to complete this p
    9·1 answer
  • Dr. Peabody paid $213 for repairs to his dental equipment. Which of the following statements is true?
    5·1 answer
  • Other things held constant, following an increase in the effective tax rate on capital, the real interest rate _____ and desired
    5·1 answer
  • Sheridan Company produces flash drives for computers, which it sells for $12 each. Each flash drive costs $9 of variable costs t
    5·1 answer
  • Logan, a 50% shareholder in Military Gear Incorporated (MG), is comparing the tax consequences of losses from C corporations wit
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!