Taxed market forces are destroying the industries
Answer:
$66.9725
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Dividend:
D1 = $1.20
D2 = $1.40
D3 = $1.55
Expected future price, P3 = $82
Required return = 8.9 percent = 0.089
Now,
Stock price today = Present value of dividends and the future value
Stock price today = 
or
Stock price today = 1.1019 + 1.1805 + 1.2001 + 63.49
or
Stock price today = $66.9725
Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Given:
400 shares of Google
399.75 per share
2% commission on purchase price.
400 shares * 399.75/share = 159,900
159,900 x 1.02 = 163, 098
The total to Bee Sting is $163,098
