I think the answer is fine dining. Because if it is a fancy restaurant they want to have as many people to cater to each customer
Small scale business society can nurture entrepreneurial skills in children
Answer:
The statement is not an express warranty, because it doesn't involve a negotiation of terms between Salazar and Mitsubishi. It is an employee of the company that imploy Salazar to bring the car should the car gives problem, and didn't involve an agreement between the two parties ( Salazar and Mitsubishi)
Explanation:
What is express warranty?
An express warranty arises from the parties’ negotiations in a sales transaction. Express warranties are often included in the written terms of a contract. An “express” warranty by a seller is created by:
Any statement of fact or promise relating to the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the statement or promise.
Any description of the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the description.
Any sample or model, which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the sample or model.
An express warranty may be created even if the seller does not use formal words such as “warranty” or “guarantee,” and even if the seller does not have a specific intention to make a warranty. However, an express warranty is not created merely because the seller makes a statement as to the value of the goods, or as to seller’s opinion of the goods. Generally, statements made by a seller during the course of contract negotiations are treated as statements of fact, unless it can be shown that the buyer could only have reasonably considered the statement to be an opinion.
Answer:
Ms. Z should invest in the State A.
Explanation:
Coupons from State A = (1 - 0.33)*0.05*75000
= 2512.5
Coupons from State R = (1 - 0.33 - 0.085)*.054*75000
= 2369.25
Therefore, Ms. Z should invest in the State A .
Answer:
The correct answer is indirect bankruptcy costs.
Explanation:
Indirect costs are considered to be damage to the image and reputation of the company, lost investment opportunities, credit restrictions, conflicts with suppliers, loss of sales, conflicts with workers. Indirect costs are usually much higher than direct costs.
