1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadezda [96]
3 years ago
9

Can you help me with some of the questions please?

Social Studies
2 answers:
denpristay [2]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Gun range, girls underwear, all sorts of strange things. There was no hard evidence that he committed the crime which made it difficult to prosecute him.

Ivins was put under periodic surveillance and an FBI document stated that he was "an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks". On July 29, 2008, Ivins committed with an overdose of acetaminophen

The 77-page report from the Government Accountability Office says the FBI's research, including novel microbial forensic tests, did not provide a full understanding of how bacteria change in their natural environment and in a laboratory. This failure to grasp the reason for genetic mutations that were used to differentiate between samples of anthrax bacteria was a "key scientific gap" in the investigation, the report says.

The GAO also found a lack of rigorous controls over sampling procedures and a failure to cite the degree of uncertainty in measurement tools used to identify genetic markers.

"Although the complexity and novelty of the scientific methods at the time of the FBI's investigation made it challenging for the FBI to adequately address all these problems, the agency could have improved its approach," the report said.

The GAO report confirms what I have often said — that the FBI's definitive conclusions about the accuracy of their scientific findings in the Amerithrax case are not, in fact, definitive," Holt said in a written statement.

An acclaimed government scientist who assisted the federal investigation of the 2001 anthrax mailings said Tuesday that he erred seven years ago when he told top Bush administration officials that material he examined probably had been altered to make it more deadly.

The scientist, Peter B. Jahrling, had observed anthrax spores with the aid of an electron microscope at the government’s biological warfare research facility at Ft. Detrick, Md

Explanation:

The presence of silicon was viewed with alarm because the material, if artificially added to the anthrax, would make it more buoyant in air and more capable of penetrating deeply into the lungs.

“I believe I made an honest mistake,” Jahrling said in response to questions e-mailed to him for this article, adding that he had been “overly impressed” by what he thought he saw under the microscope.

“I should never have ventured into this area,” said Jahrling, who is a virologist, referring to his analysis of the anthrax, which is a bacterium. Jahrling’s initial analysis -- and his briefing of officials at the White House

At Tuesday’s hearing, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), pressed Mueller anew about how the silicon got into the spores.

After being informed of the events at the hearing, Jahrling renounced his earlier analysis.

“In retrospect,” Jahrling said, “I believe I was mistaken and defer to the experts.”

xenn [34]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

to the qustion How many field offices does the FBI currently have?

the answer is 56

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statements regarding Africa culture is correct
Basile [38]

Answer:

where are the statements??

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which pact stated the unified hope for world peace and outlawed aggressive actions and war
Vadim26 [7]

League of Nations Pact

8 0
3 years ago
Damage to the environment occurs because:_________a) pollution occurs naturally, with or without human activity. b) most busines
LiRa [457]

Answer:

C

Damage to the environment occurs because:  In the process of obtaining goods and services we enjoy, pollution occurs

6 0
3 years ago
Do you know what human rights are?​
serious [3.7K]

Explanation:

human right are right of a citizen

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Supreme Court chooses to hear cases that __________.
rusak2 [61]
Supreme Court has the power to review and make final decisions about the outcomes of trials of other instances. Specifically it's the one institution that has the power to interpret the Constitution. Because of this I believe that the best answer is the last one: Supreme Court is responsible for cases which involve interpretations of the Constitution. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If the production of a product or service involves external benefits, then the government can improve efficiency in the market b
    11·1 answer
  • Which type of question do you answer based on making connections to your own experiences? A) interpretive. B) adaptive. C) evalu
    10·1 answer
  • What types of exercises are swimming, bicycling, walking briskly, and tennis?
    10·1 answer
  • What does the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel guarantee an accused criminal to?
    11·1 answer
  • In the short story "The Necklace", what is the most likely reason Madame Forestier gets annoyed when Madame Loisel returns the n
    7·2 answers
  • What are the titles of the two presiding officers of the Senate?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the floowing false?
    7·1 answer
  • Pwease help this is very important I will give you brain thing if its correct ♡
    12·2 answers
  • Explain the features of Mahatma Gandhi National rural employment guarantee act (MGNREGA)-2005​
    5·2 answers
  • 1
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!