<span>A polynomial with the given zeros can be represented as
f(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x+2)(x+3).
Note that if you set f(x) = 0, then 1,2,-2, and -3 certainly are the solutions. From here, we simply multiply/expand out the polynomial. We can do this in a variety of ways, one of which is taking the left two and right two products separately. We have
(x-1)(x-2) = x^2 - 3x + 2
and
(x+2)(x+3) = x^2 + 5x + 6.
This gives that
f(x) = (x^2 - 3x + 2) (x^2 + 5x + 6).
Expanding this expression out then gives us our answer as
f(x) = x^4 + 2x^3 - 7x^2 - 8x + 12
or answer choice B.</span>
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, 1/4 = 2x.
1/4 / x = 2
cause 2x is multiplication
and the other side shows divison for the right side of the and
also, solution
x = .125
Answer: 166
Step-by-step explanation:
Number of trophies = 3
Total Legos required for all trophies = 324
Number of Legos for largest trophy(A) = 220
Number of Legos for smallest trophy(B) = 135
Number of Legos required for final trophy(C)
=?
Total Legos = [Number of Legos for largest trophy(A) + Number of Legos for smallest trophy(B) + Number of Legos required for final trophy(C)]
324 = 220 +135 + C
324 = 355 + C
324 - 355 = C
-31 = C
135 + 31 = 166
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
