A scalene triangle can never be an isosceles triangle. How? Well, let's take a look at the definition of a scalene triangle. In short, a scalene triangle is a classification of a triangle that does not have any congruent sides. On the other hand, an isosceles triangle is a triangle in which its legs are both congruent. Therefore, if a scalene triangle has two congruent legs, it wouldn't even be a scalene triangle, but instead it would be an isosceles triangle. Hope this helped!
Answer: the required probability is 0.03516
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data in the question;
let F represent dominant allele that causes fluffy fur and
f represent corresponding recessive allele that causes wiry fur
here are the possible genotypes and corresponding phenotypes;
FF = Fluffy fur
Ff = Fluffy fur
ff = Wiry fur
genotype of parents is Ff and Ff
and there cross will be; Ff x Ff
now Offspring will be;
F f
F FF Ff
f Ff ff
so the probability that the offspring will have fluffy fur = 3/4
and the probability that the offspring will have wiry fur = 1/4
The probability that the first 2 out of 4 offspring will have fluffy fur will be;
⇒ 3/4 × 3/4 × 1/4 × 1/4 = 0.03516
Therefore, the required probability is 0.03516
Answer:
It is therefore a exponential function, as y increases with x.
Step-by-step explanation:
coordinates: ( 7 , 5 ) , ( 16 , 10 )
Slope: 
: 
: 
equation: y - y1 = m( x - x1 )
: 
: 
check if third coordinates matches:
......does not match, so its not linear.
Note: This is the answer if you are talking about a triangle because you didn't specify that.
A=30°
I'm going to assume this is a triangle so if I'm wrong tell me in the comments. If it is a triangle all the angles should add up to 180 degrees. We already know that one is 90 so the other two angles have to add up to 90 (since 90+90=180). C is twice as much as A. So 1/3 of 90 is A and 2/3 of 90 is C. <em>A would be 30°</em>. In summary A=30° B=90° C=60°. Hopefully I understood your question correctly and this helped you. Also sorry it took a while to answer.
Answer:
I think 432 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
p=2w+2l
(2*33)+(2*39)=144
432ft
sorry if this is not the right answer
