Answer:
Under government bankruptcy laws of the United States, anybody can declare financial insolvency in order to look for help from leasers. In any case, this comes to the detriment of harming one's financial assessments for quite a while (now and then upto a multi year time span) alongside bringing about critical lawful,, procedural and court charges.
That being stated, liquidations are significantly troublesome procedures essentially in light of the fact that loan bosses would not need any account holder to take the easy way off in the event that the indebted person wouldn't like to restitution. This is considerably progressively evident if there should be an occurrence of understudy advances where the borrower (Kay for this situation) needs to demonstrate without sensible uncertainty that he/she would confront "undue hardship" in the event that he/she were to continue with credit reimbursements. The "undue hardship" demonstrating part is available to an assortment of understandings, rounds of questioning and lawful examination by the courtroom. Most courts use the "Brunner Test" to decide an indebted person's qualification for understudy advance release. The key arrangements of the test are set somewhere around the United States Department of Education's, Federal Student Aid Office as given beneath:
(a) The account holder, in view of his/her present pay and costs, can't keep up a better than average "insignificant" way of life for himself/herself and his/her wards in the event that he/she were to proceed with the advance reimbursements.
(b) Additional conditions demonstrate certain the way that this condition will prevail for a larger part of the residency of the advance reimbursement.
(c) The borrower has taken a stab at reimbursing his/her understudy advance in accordance with some basic honesty up until this point.
In this specific situation, Kay would be in an ideal situation in attempting to get the advance deferred, on the off chance that she declares financial insolvency post changing her activity. This is so on the grounds that her present place of employment pays enough to reimburse her understudy advance and consequently don't meet two of the three Brunner Test models. Exchanging over to the non benefit employment would compromise her present way of life (and most likely that of her wards) and adjusts to the fundamental soul of the "Brunner Test". It would off base be upto her legitimate insight to demonstrate this danger (post work change) to her expectation for everyday comforts before the court and addition an understudy advance waiver.
Answer:
DSO is 50.34 days and late payment by 5.34 days
Explanation:
In this question, we use the day's sales outstanding formula which is shown below:
Days sales outstanding = (Accounts receivable ÷ Net credit Sales) × total number of days in a year
= ($60,000 ÷ $435,000) × 365 days
= 0.1379 × 365 days
= 50.34 days
Now, the customer paying early or late equals to
= DSO - Credit period
= 50.34 days - 45 days
= 5.34 days
The amount indicates a positive answer which reflects the late payment
Answer:
(I)
retained earnings 92,400 debit
common stock 28,600 credit
additional paid-in 63,800 credit
(II)
retained earnings 924,000 debit
common stock 286,000 credit
additional paid-in 638,000 credit
(III) no entry required
Explanation:
22,000 x 10% = 2,200 new shares
market price:
2,200 X $42 = 92,400
book value
2,200 x $13 = 28,600
additional paid-in
63,800
100% sotkc dividends:
22,000 x 100% = 22,000 new shares
market price:
22,000 X $42 = 924,000
book value
22,000 x $13 = 286,000
additional paid-in
638,000
the stock split will not change the accounting as the total value fo the equity remains the same.
Answer: An increase in the expected price level shifts short-run aggregate supply to the D. Left, and an increase in the actual price level does not shift short-run aggregate supply.
Explanation: Aggregate supply is the total supply of goods and services that are available in a given market. The producers have production levels match a specific amount of items and then disperse them to the market. As prices change, then quantity supplied and purchased fluctuates accordingly.
