Option 4: Colonies took advantage of the war's distraction and fought for independence.
Napoleon quickly took control of the Iberian Peninsula. With Napoleon's occupation in Spain, Spanish Creoles in Latin America were questioning their alliance.
Answer:
- Reduction in interest for people to join the activity.
- Harder implementation.
Explanation:
Development activities tend to be created by the government if they wanted to increase the quality of workforce that they have. They usually do this through courses or public presentation.
If the government let some members of the public to participate, it can contribute to the overall success of these activities.
For example, the government can cooperate with the people that have high respect in a certain community to advocate for the program. These type of people have the power to inspire other member of the communities to participate in the programs.
Removing public participation will make the activities look like another effort from politicians to gained support rather than activities that created to genuinely help the people.
Answer:
Mia tribe is a greek social coorperative enterprise which services vulnerable people who are recognised as victims of domestic victims.
Explanation:
Answer: If two-thirds of the members of each house of the General Assembly vote to override a governor's veto, then it can become a law.
Explanation:
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
