Answer: Foreign direct investment
Explanation: This would be an example of a foreign direct investment according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. A foreign direct investment is one such as a business or individual in one country buying into business interests in another country and usually occurs when such entities establish foreign business operations or is engaged in the acquisition of foreign business assets in a foreign company.
Foreign direct investments are of three types (horizontal, vertical and conglomerate) are are carried out to expand the investment base in a country, create employment through the creation of newer job opportunities, the introduction of advanced technology and so on.
Answer: A. Stability and change
Explanation:
The innovation paradox implies that consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. This results in a conflict between
A) stability and change.
B) structure and culture.
C) rewards and metrics.
D) stability and metrics
The paralysis that occurs between sticking to existing products and services (stability) and the need for the development of new ones (change) is a direct effect of the innovation paradox which states that the more a firm pays attention to innovation, the less likely it will be to be successful at innovation. In other words, consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. While stability enables change in that it supplies security and consistency, reserved knowledge and skills and enables commitment and the provision of resources for a better realization and actualization of change, change enables a firm to set up a new state of stability through variable mechanisms (innovation) This serves to assist an organization in reaching new stable stages with higher efficiency.
Answer:
The Correct answer is "Because it supplies a higher quantity of output than a single price monopolist"
Explanation:
A cost segregating monopolist charges distinctive cost to various gathering of shoppers based on their capacity to pay, which empower it to create higher amount than a non-separating monopolist. Since it supplies a higher amount of yield than a solitary value monopolist.
Answer:
2011 = 113
2012 = 119
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
GDP deflator = (Nominal GDP) ÷ (Real GDP) × 100
For 2011, it would be
= ($13,495 billion) ÷ ($11,919 billion) × 100
= 113
For 2012, it would be
= ($14,241 billion) ÷ ($12,007 billion) × 100
= 119
In order to find out the GDP deflator, we divided the Nominal GDP by the Real GDP