Answer:
True
Explanation:
For computing the cost of the completed jobs in a job-order costing system we have to consider the actual direct materials cost, actual direct labor cost, and the manufacturing overhead cost applied.
In mathematically,
The total cost of completed job = Direct Material cost + Direct labor cost + manufacturing overhead cost
Therefore, the given statement is true
Let us see it from a cost-efficiency point of view. We have that every unit of the first selles costs 40$. But the total cost might be higher, since there is a chance for defect. On average, on 3% of the cases the defect will happen and it will cost him 500$. Hence, on average, a fence unit from producer a costs 40$ and has a repair cost of 3%*500$=15$. The total thus is 55$. For the second provider of fences, the standard cost is 50$. Similarly, the average repair cost is 0,5%*500$=2,5$. Hence, the total cost per unit is 52,5$ (total cost=upfront payment+repair costs). We see thus that the lady should win the bid; even if you pay more upfront, the difference in durability makes up the cost difference.
Answer: Volkswagen invested in Russia because Russia’s economy was growing rapidly and living standards were rising while the level of car ownership was still low. This made Volkswagen believe that the demand for cars would grow quickly.
FDI was preferable because Volkswagen’s competitors were also investing in production facilities in Russia, so they felt that they needed to invest directly to be on the same levels as their rivals.
Answer:
Opportunity cost = $6900 monthly or $82800 yearly.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost = $6900 monthly or $82800 yearly.
The opportunity cost is the gain forgone for the other alternative, or ultimately a loss to acquire other opportunity.
Here, the opportunity cost is gain of $6900 forgone to operate the fitness studio within the store by Nike.
In many companies, the chief executive officer (CEO), who holds the top management position in the company, also serves as chairman of the board. This is often the case with companies that have grown rapidly and still retain the initial founder in those roles.
