If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Answer:
c. full employment
Explanation:
The classical theory states that the existence of full employment is normal in economy.To classical economists, the diversion of economy from full employment is something abnormal. Classical theory states that unemployment is caused in economy due to involvement of trade union legislation and minimum wage legislation in free market system.
So the answer is c. full employment
Permanent team structure was Hester now a part of under the new ownership.
Explanation:
Team structure relates to the makeup of a single team or a multi-team program. The organisation of teams is an important component of teamwork. The successful collaboration, teamwork, behavioural management and collective aid are the product of a correctly organised patient care team.
Permanent teams are workplace units structured like a formal organisation. The team brings together staff from all fields of work, such as the components supply and logistics for an automotive plant, concentrated on a particular task or project.
Its B. or C.
If you have any other questions, please contact me on Brainly.com and I will be happy to answer.
-Diane.
Answer:
A) Year 1 cost of goods sold
B) Year 2 cost of goods sold
D) Year 2 beginning inventory
Explanation:
A) Year 1 expense of merchandise sold : The Current year cost of Goods Sold is processed by deducting finishing stock from Opening Inventory and Purchases made during the year. So in the event that the completion stock isn't right, at that point the result of above calculation will not be right so the Year 1 expense of merchandise sold for example (Current year cost of Goods Sold) will be inaccurate.
D) Year 2 starting stock: year 2 starting stock is equivalent to year 1 completion stock. So on the off chance that off-base stock estimation is made at end of earlier year, at that point current year opening worth will be carried on as off-base.
B) Year 2 expense of merchandise sold: The explanation is same as ans q(i.e. Year 1 expense of merchandise sold) as off-base convey forward opening stock worth will bring about wrong calculation of cost of products sold for year 2.
