Answer:
a) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 642.
Step-by-step explanation:
since in the question it is mentioned that the average attendance at games should be more 642 and according to this he moving the team with a larger stadium. Also the hypothesis conducted and the conclusion would be failure to deny the null hypothesis
So here the conclusion that should be made in non-technical term is that there should be no enough proof in order to support the claim that the mean attendence is more than $642
Considering there is a function (relationship) and that it is linear, the distance will change proportionally to time constantly. In other words, we are taking the speed to be constant throughout the journey.
If we let:
t = time (min's) driving
d = distance (miles) from destination
Then we can represent the above information as:
t = 40: d = 59
t = 52: d = 50
If we think of this as a graph, we can think of the x-axis representing time and the y-axis representing the distance to the destination. Being linear, the function will be a line, i.e. it will have a constant gradient. If you were plot the two points inferred from the information and connect the two dots, you will get a declining line (one with a negative gradient) representing the inversely proportional relationship or equally, the negative correlation between the time driving and the distance to the destination. The equation of this line will be the linear function that relates time and the distance to the destination. To find this linear function, we do as follows:
Find the gradient (m) of the line:
m = Δy/Δx
In this case, the x-values are t-values and our y-values are d-values, so:
Δy = Δd
= 50 - 59
= -9
Δx = Δt
= 52 - 40
= 12
m = -9/12 = -3/4
Note: m is equivalent to speed with units: d/t
Use formula to find function and rearrange to give it in the desired format:
y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)
d - 50 = -3/4(t - 52)
4d - 200 = -3t + 156
4d + 3t - 356 = 0
Let t = 70 to find d at the time:
4d + 3(70) - 356 = 0
4d + 210 - 356 = 0
4d - 146 = 0
4d = 146
d = 73/2 = 36.5 miles
So after 70 min's of driving, Dale will be 36.5 miles from his destination.
Sent a picture of the solution to the problem (s).
If length of rectangle is 8 cm, breadth is 4 cm, side of square is 3 cm, base of triangle is 3 cm, then the area of figure will be 48.5 
.
Given that length of rectangle is 8 cm, Breadth of rectangle is 4 cm,side of square is 3 cm,base of right angled triangle is 3 cm,height of triangle is 5 cm.
Area of figure=Area of rectangle+Area of square+Area of triangle
Area of rectangle=length*breadth
Area of square=Side*Side
Area of triangle=1/2 *Base*Height
Area of figure=8*4+3*3+1/2 *3*5
=32+9+1/2 *15
=41+15/2
=(82+15)/2
=97/2
=48.5
Hence if length of rectangle is 8 cm, breadth is 4 cm, side of square is 3 cm, base of triangle is 3 cm, then the area of figure will be 48.5 .
Learn more about area at brainly.com/question/25292087
#SPJ9
8 + 3/4 - 11<span> + </span>1/3<span> = - </span>215<span>/12 = - 17 </span>11/12 = - 17.9166666667; Result written as: improper fraction, mixednumber<span> (also called mixed fraction) and decimal </span><span>number</span>
