Answer:
The correct answer is economics of scale.
Explanation:
Economies of scale can be defined as the cost advantage experienced by the firms when they increase their output level. As the cost of production gets spread over a large quantity of output the average cost declines.
These costs can be both variables as well as fixed. Economies of scale can be both internal as well as external.
Size of business affects the economies of scale, larger the firm the more will be savings on cost.
Answer:
$17,000
Explanation:
Fair market value before casualty is $17,000 while Fair market value after casualty is none. The starting point for the calculation of loss deduction will be based on the fair market value before casualty which is $17,000.
Answer:
It depends upon the Law prevailing in your country/state
Explanation:
Wright Automobiles, a used car dealer, has to purchase soft drinks and snacks for the vending machines in the customer lobby. This buying situation demonstrates a <u>straight rebuy.</u>
<u></u>
A purchase in which the customer buys the same goods in the same quantity on the same terms from the same supplier.
Modified rebuy is a state of affairs wherein the client makes some adjustments within the order, and it could require some additional analysis or studies. straight rebuy: wherein the client reorders the identical products without seeking out data or thinking about different suppliers.
If your company is upset with a dealer's product and the procurement crew makes modifications to the order, you completed a changed rebuy. There are several motives for agencies to try this new requirement, excessive costs, suppliers, product adjustments, etc.
A buying scenario in which an individual or agency buys goods that have been bought previously, however, adjustments either the provider or a few other elements of the preceding order.
Learn more about straight rebuy here brainly.com/question/8530057
#SPJ4
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
According to information on your question. We are to note that an absence or reduction of suppliers could lead to lower supply.
As in this case, the producer supply loss of $60 was incurred as some sellers dropped out of the market as a result of the tax.