Yep! They are all right! Great job, could write a bit better.... sorry
Answer:
w < 8 meters ( w must be greater than 0 because length cannot be 0)
Step-by-step explanation:
One side with building is 23 meters, the other opposite side also will be 23 meters (with rope).
Let width (remaining 2 sides) be "w", he has AT MOST 39 meters of rope, so we can write:
Rope Needed = 23 + 2w < 39
Simplifying:
The range of possible values of w is 
meters (of course w has to be greater than 0)
Answer:
25 nickles are 5/12ths of a dollar
Step-by-step explanation:
25*5=125, or $1.25. Now we make this a fraction, we get 1.25/3, or 5/12
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
What is unmeasured cofounding?
- By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
- The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.
Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:
brainly.com/question/10863424
#SPJ4
Answer:
yes
if you solve the equation,
5x+15=7x-11
26=2x
x=26/2=13
Step-by-step explanation:
