Answer:
Athanasius thought of the gold as an opportunity to help people whereas John fled from the scene as if he was being chased by a monster thinking that taking gold out of somewhere was a sin.
Explanation:
Athanasius wanted to take the gold as he saw no sin in helping the neighbor population with it but everything John felt was fear as soon as he saw the gold.
John was a man of simple ethics and lifestyle and didn't want any complications to his life.
Athanasius was a man of his own doings and always liked to think otherwise. He believed the bag of gold was a gift from an angel.
John believed in changing things for people by on's hard work and determination.
Both the brothers varied with different perspectives on life.
False, you need to explain what the readers will see
Answer:
We learned about unconditional love and loyalty, because Doodle loved him always, even when the narrator was treating Doodle with deliberate cruelty. We learned about gentleness and sensitivity. (We remembered watching Doodle struggle alone to bury the ibis.)
Mr. Gradgrind describes himself as an "eminently practical" man. He lives by the philosophy of rationalism, self-interest, and cold, hard fact. He forbids his children to develop imagination and emotions.
Students who will be the products of Mr.Grandgrind's educational system will most likely be a replica of his children; emotionally impaired, self-serving, hypocrite, and manipulative.
