I believe the answer is: double blind procedures
double blind procedures refers to a form of study in which both participants and the researchers do not know which subjects are receiving the treatment. The purpose of double blind procedures is to prevent the bias held by the experimenters along with placebo effects.
Answer:
Catalan Atlas inscription
inscription
Explanation:
Answer:
a) Personal conflict is encouraged
Explanation:
<em>Note: from the way the question is redacted I am assuming that the question actually is "The personal values of team members on high-performing teams can be enhanced through all of the following beneficial communication practices EXCEPT" so, I'll give my personal answer based on that. </em>
<em />
The term high performing teams refers to teams or groups that are highly focused on their goals and that achieve superior business results. High-performance teams outperform all other similar teams and they outperform expectations given their composition.
Within these kind of teams all important topics are openly discussed since the main goal is to get superior results, as a consequence of this, problems that might present within the team or outside of it are proactively reported. High-performance teams have strong methods of resolving conflict efficiently, so that conflict does not become a roadblock to achieving the team's goals, however, these conflicts have to do with organization problems and not with <u>personal conflicts</u> among the members of the team.
This teams focuses too on mutual trust (trusting in other team members and trusting in the team as an entity) as well as using effective communication methods and channels by putting value in diversity.
<u>Thus, we can see that the only communication practices that do not belong to high-performing teams is: A) personal conflict is encouraged. </u>
<u />
The answer seems best to me is D) Conservatives.
Most Conservatives prefer justices who will interpret the law in a strict constructionist manner.
Explanation:
The Reapportionment Act of 1929 allowed states to draw districts of varying size and shape. It also allowed states to abandon districts altogether and elect at least some representatives at large, which several states chose to do, including New York, Illinois, Washington, Hawaii, and New Mexico.
